Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing

Essay topics:

Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Some people are of the opinion that governments should not allocate budgets to scientists whose research results are not clear. However, others such as me oppose it, while sharing the idea that governments have to support scientists whether their results are clear or not. Both of the groups have reasons to advocate their claim, which are going to be discussed as follows.

Governments have many more important positions to invest on and spend money for rather than funding projects which have unclear results, it is what the first group claims. They believe that in the world today that governments have faced severe problems in economical fields, they have to spend money on work that gaurantee their success. They think that governments do not have enough chances to take risks in a condition that scientific researchs require hug part of the budgets. They offer authorities to invest budgets to improve museums, recreation facilities, parks, factories, and the like, to earn more money to promote the general welfare of people, instead of doing scientific researches with obscure future.

However, I think there are many factors that the group mentioned above has failed to see and still believe that scientific researches deserve investing money on, even if they have obscure consequences. First of all, it should be highlighted that every research, whether successful or not, hase a consequense. To explain more, academic people cannot understand the right way if they do not experience wrong ways, or they do not face problems. For example, if a researcher has tried to build a device but he was not able to reach a specific thing, he will submit his results and these submitted results will be useful for others not to re-experience again such things.

As the other reason, funding scientific researches is a kind of strong encouragement for academic people, educators and researchers. It has to be considered that there are noting in the world to be without disadvantagious. If there is a risk of failing to success, there is also a probability to flourish and enhance the knowledge, which is also follwed by earning more money and providing people with more convinient life.

To put it in a nutshell, governments, have to provide people with various facilities and fund them as much as they need, even if they do not have clear proposals.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 shahajan999 66 view
2023-09-29 seoul_milk 83 view
2023-08-07 sark 60 view
2023-07-27 cringelord 79 view
2023-07-27 cringelord 45 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user negin papen :

Comments

Sentence: They believe that in the world today that governments have faced severe problems in economical fields, they have to spend money on work that gaurantee their success.
Error: gaurantee Suggestion: guarantee

Sentence: First of all, it should be highlighted that every research, whether successful or not, hase a consequense.
Error: hase Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: consequense Suggestion: consequence

Sentence: It has to be considered that there are noting in the world to be without disadvantagious.
Error: disadvantagious Suggestion: disadvantageous

Sentence: If there is a risk of failing to success, there is also a probability to flourish and enhance the knowledge, which is also follwed by earning more money and providing people with more convinient life.
Error: follwed Suggestion: followed
Error: convinient Suggestion: convenient

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 389 350
No. of Characters: 1915 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.441 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.923 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.678 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.261 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.589 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5