Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve

Essay topics:

Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Scientific research and development is important for the development of nations, betterment of world. Any restriction placed on research and development can hinder its advancement.

Goverenment policies in every nation are not updated frequently with the changing circumstances. In this case, any restriction placed on research in development can obstract its advancement in particular area. For example, many years back in China operations of alive humans or animals were not allowed. Doctors should not give cut to the body while treatement. At that time, segerions were developing in the world but doctors in China were affraid to adopt segerions, due to restrictions by govenment, which was hindering them treating patients who can be cured by surgery, and also restricting them to contribute by doing research in the medical field. Government in China took many years to change this policy, but other countries were already using segerions from long back. Thus, now days, technology is changing everyday, new researchs are being publish so frequenty nowdays then ten years back, but if we look at goverenment policies, its being updated every 10 to 15 years.

Government restrictions can hinder research in some particular feild. For example, if any country is in the favor of peace and put restictions on the development of nuclear power. Now scientists in that country may not work on explore more on nuclear power and its benefits. In this case, nuclear power development is hindered for that country.

There is a otherside of the coin also, if there is no restriction at all by the government, then research products can used to harm the society and ultimately can cause danger to human life. For example, North Korea is testing nuclear weapons racklessly, which is casing fear in the world.

Therefore, in conclusion, government need not to put restrictions on research and development, but need to make sure its results are for the welfare of the human kind.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 pratysinha 50 view
2020-01-19 jason123 75 view
2020-01-09 asdfjmn 66 view
2019-10-04 muthukrishna 66 view
2019-10-04 Persian Moonlight 16 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sril :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... Thus, now days, technology is changing everyday, new researchs are being publish so fre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... hindered for that country. There is a otherside of the coin also, if there is...
^
Line 9, column 47, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'put'?
Suggestion: put
...ore, in conclusion, government need not to put restrictions on research and developmen...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2131661442 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93477875941 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539184952978 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.851770024 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136353797659 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512501262264 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330451222618 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871209352012 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192834685351 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.