The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the greatness of someone can by decided with the people living during his life or other people who come after him. Indisputably, some people were discovered their significant contributions to human's life after their death. Nevertheless, many others were honored and awarded for their contributions during their lives. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that the greatness of individuals can be only decided after their death and would argue that many individuals greatness can be also decided by their contemporaries.
First of all, the individual greatness has many meanings for people. One of them is someone who achieves somthing which people consider is big contribution in life. I would like to point at that this achivement is usually difficult for anyone to reach. to illustrate further, let's look at the example of inventing light pulp by Thomas Edison. The light pulp change the whole world. In his circumstance, this scientist is considered a great person for this invention.
Furthermore, many people were honored with big prizes during their lives. One of them is President Sadat, Egyptian president, he was honored for his invitation to his enemy for peace and stopping war. He was considered as one of the greatest people at this time. He was recognized by all people who lived at this times and people who come after him. Both common sense and personal experience have told that the individual greatness depends on the people awareness of how big this individual's achievements is.
Admittedly, there are many examples in history about individuals who were decided as great people after their death. they were ignored by people living at the same time of history. However, the above statement does not constitute sufficient evidence that how only the greatness of individuals can be decided by those who live after them.
In conclusion, the greatness of an individual can be decided by both their contemporaries and who lives after them. This greatness depends on the awareness of people about this individual achievements and the meaning of someone's greatness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | IFE360TOXIC | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Zhang Ergou | 70 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement."Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 16
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora."Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora's citizens 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...r their death and would argue that many individuals greatness can be also decided by their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... usually difficult for anyone to reach. to illustrate further, lets look at the ex...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s recognized by all people who lived at this times and people who come after him. Bo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ends on the people awareness of how big this individuals achievements is. Admitt...
^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ided as great people after their death. they were ignored by people living at the sa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23768115942 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85399670751 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475362318841 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6375442171 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.35 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270730816092 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958009678047 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934995126368 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185203912082 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725823876726 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.