Over the last couple of centuries, machines have assisted humans to achieve great development in human society and helped humans attain extensive knowledge. The prompt claims that the machine will never be able to surpass a human brain, as the machine is just a tool of the human mind. However, I mostly disagree with the above argument for two main reasons, which I will elucidate below. Although I concede that the human brain is quite intricate, it can be challenging for a machine to supplant it.
To begin, the machine are able to perform a given task with much better efficiency than human in many cases. There are no doubts about the above claim, as we can see many examples of it in our day-to-day lives. Machines are replacing humans in many laborious tasks. Machines can work in environments where humans cannot even survive, and the Mars rover is a perfect example of this. Machines have even given a toe-to-toe competition to the grand master in a game of chess. Thus, it is fair to say that machines can perform tasks better than humans in many fields. These claims are likely to become stronger over time.
Secondly, there has been a great development in the working of machines in the last few decades. Machine learning, neural networks, and other such disciplines in science and mathematics are major boons in the development of machines. With the advance of AI (Artificial Intelligence), machines are now, to a good extent, able to replicate tasks that were previously considered impossible for a machine. Examples of such task include converting a text to speech with a good fluency, autonomous driving, etc. With the advance of humanoid robots like Sofia (a well-known humanoid robot), the boundaries between humans and machines have been reduced significantly. Recent technologies like ChatGPT, which is an AI assistant, are considered a boon in the field of AI. Hence, we can say that machines are becoming more and more human like and might just pass humans someday.
Lastly, however, there are certain skepticisms among the scholars about the extent to which machine can advance. As of today, even the most complicated supercomputers are not on par with the speed at which the human brain can perform calculations within a given timeframe. Also, there is the factor of emotion, which is still peculiar to humans. But with the recent development of quantum computers, the first scenario is likely to disappear. Also, if we factor in the age of the machine, it is still in the novice stage, and someday it might develop more complicated functionality like showing emotions.
In conclusion, I believe it is still too early to comment on whether machines can surpass humans or if they will just be a tool for the human mind.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 62
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse i 70
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 58
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ars rover is a perfect example of this. Machines have even given a toe-to-toe competitio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71531197911 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484913793103 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2143129563 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291624780302 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904442561544 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698423381813 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193217752717 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763415033141 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ars rover is a perfect example of this. Machines have even given a toe-to-toe competitio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71531197911 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484913793103 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2143129563 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291624780302 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904442561544 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698423381813 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193217752717 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763415033141 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.