This is a rapidly developed world, accompanied with the development is increasingly rapid pace of human’s life. Someone believes that such pace causes more problems than it solves, while others hold the opposite position. In my own view, I agree with the former one that the rapid pace has more bad effects rather than benefit our lives.
There is a saying in China that “Mistakes are caused by hastiness.” That means when a person is busy with something, it is hard to take care of other things, if the person has to deal with another thing at the same time, the person will certainly make mistakes. That is true for today’s people, when one’s time is occupied by work, then it is difficult for him or her to take care of families, then family problems occur. When people spend more time on their families, then surely have not enough energy to deal with their work. The rapid lifestyle is forcing people to make choices, but nobody knows which choice is better and most of us make mistake when facing it.
The rapid lifestyle is at least partly caused by technology development. With more and more advanced cars and convenient communication method, our lives are connected together tightly. Some people believe that more convenient transports will help to solve or mitigate the problem, but that always make the problem worse because of traffic jam. That is understandable, most people try to save their own time and want to have an efficient and rapid life, but if everyone wants to be the fastest, then everyone is the lowest. In such case, the convenient cars become the problem finally. It is same when things come to the communication. There are lots of communication method online, that means we could talk to others in anytime and anywhere, that is useful when we want to share our lives with families or friends. However, it also reduces our private spaces, that is even after working all day, the boss could still contact with employees and arrange more work to them. And employees cannot ignore the boos directly, then even they have arrived at home, they still need to keep nervous and be ready to engage to the work again.
We must admit that rapid pace of life can really help to solve some problems, for it can promote people to find more and learn more, thus they can compete with others better. But the competition between people has become stranger day by day. In Chinese there is a hot word called “self-rolled”, which means compete with others overly. The phenomenon is severe especially in university, if a student writes a thesis about 2000 words, then there must be some students write more than 4000 words. If they could write something wise or profound, that could be encouraged. However, most of words are just bootless, the only function of them is make the thesis longer and then satisfy the professor in order to show how diligent they are and then to get a better grade. After several years of “self-rolled”, most of students have chosen a solution called “lay down”, that is ignoring all others’ behaviors and do their own things. The problem is the “self-rolled” promotes “lay down” and destroy the normal competition, which can enhance people in a normal way.
All in all, the rapid pace of life could benefit us in some ways, but it must be controlled in a certain degree, or it will certainly cause more problems than it solves. Not to mention a increasingly rapid pace of life mentioned in the title.
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 66
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the President of the Amburg Chamber of Commerce Last October the city of Belleville installed high intensity lighting in its central business district and vandalism there declined almost immediately The
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 66
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals 50
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 578, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the words') or simply say ''most words''.
Suggestion: most of the words; most words
...und, that could be encouraged. However, most of words are just bootless, the only function of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 803, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
.... After several years of “self-rolled”, most of students have chosen a solution called “lay down...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1040, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a normal way" with adverb for "normal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l competition, which can enhance people in a normal way. All in all, the rapid pace of life ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...problems than it solves. Not to mention a increasingly rapid pace of life mention...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, really, so, still, then, thus, while, another thing, as to, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2883.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 601.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79700499168 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58479738396 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480865224626 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 891.9 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.867338803 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.884615385 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1153846154 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88461538462 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332683011944 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088573968904 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965125179895 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233330542101 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143343085483 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.