It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
The group of people is observed all the time, might be a jobers groop, a studens group util a group of frinds. However, it’s not possible we say or judge somebody for your character for people that they are together. Therefore, I don’t agree with the argument that It’s primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. Since that the people are differents anf think different.
My first reason is relate with homophobic situation. Much people judge a person if it are walkin, lunching out util hunging a gay person. This is a bad habity of the people and it is not good. For exemple, I have a friend that he is gay. And since I was young boy, I have long time with him. When we was youngest we spend a lot time together, and some people started say that I was gay because my friend. He styed very bad with this situation, and me to. However, we never cut our friendship because of the people comments.
My second reason, is that there are much bad politics and there are good to. Since that the people usually say, “ever politicians stolen ous” or “all politicans is not good” we are generalization. For instance, in Brazil we have much problems with politicans and always the civilation say that we don’t have any good politicans. However, we have somenoes that don’t made corruptions like the majory, like the president that was expulse because she made investigations with other jobers. Staying evident that there are some people different in the set of government.
Third, it’s impossible we know the nature of a person without know well. Since that all groups have people with different opinions, and the people usually discuss of the averthing and each member have a opino it’s impossible know the people. For exemple a group of friends that are going to a party, there are someone that drink alcaholic other not, and when you see one of them with a beer on the hand, don’t means that all will drink.
In conclusion, I don’t agree with the statement because it’s not good jouge the people without know. Therefore, I think berofe you joudge or say about sombody, you need meet it very well, for don’t say things inapropriated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | skylarzjy | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Vaibhav Panchal | 58 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 48
- young people enjoy more than the older. Therefore, I agree with this statement that young people enjoy life more than older people do 60
- TPO- Encyclopedia 76
- young people enjoy more than the older Therefore I agree with this statement that young people enjoy life more than older people do 60
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...social groups that we define ourselves. Since that the people are differents anf thin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'related'.
Suggestion: related
...think different. My first reason is relate with homophobic situation. Much people ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: Many
...on is relate with homophobic situation. Much people judge a person if it are walkin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation. Much people judge a person if it are walkin, lunching out util hunging...
^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...tion. Much people judge a person if it are walkin, lunching out util hunging a gay...
^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nging a gay person. This is a bad habity of the people and it is not good. For ex...
^^
Line 6, column 251, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...zation. For instance, in Brazil we have much problems with politicans and always the...
^^^^
Line 8, column 207, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s of the averthing and each member have a opino it's impossible know the peo...
^
Line 10, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...'t agree with the statement because it's not good jouge the people wit...
^^
Line 10, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee with the statement because it's not good jouge the people without know. ...
^^
Line 10, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ou joudge or say about sombody, you need meet it very well, for don't say th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9057591623 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69175130126 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484293193717 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6643139652 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1818181818 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238533344017 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737911914294 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131317027157 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14779687264 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137537106282 0.0667264976115 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.