Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Discussion on what make a good leader is not a trivial one- many researchers in the work I have try to define the meaning of leader and how leaders are made. The world-renowned activist Socrates, in 1960 define leader as the topmost position of organization in the any community, the position that can make and break any community. While Nelson Mandela define leader as a good follower in the society, one who handle and execute a particular situation placed in front of him or her with great prejudice. These and many more definitions have received criticizing over the time- showing that define one and what makes one is not an essay task. The prompt of this essay says that successful leader in our society is those that are developed with the nature of task they are faced with. I strongly disagree with this issue that only the demands from a leader define them for 2 reasons.
Firstly, a leader is not born in a day. It takes different stages, involving different numbers of professional to complete a beautify story build. Building a house that will longevity is not a day job. It requires having good design, buying blocks, laying the foundation and gradual development of the house. Likewise, as a house cannot be built one day, a leader can’t be made only by the challenges or the demands in his or her fronts. What if his face with the one beyond his or capacity or knowledge? What will happen to the nation? Will the nation succeed? History says otherwise. One good example is Second World War fight between USA and Japan in 1956. 24 hours after Japan Commander Lin ho ordered the launch their Rpg and missile on USA soil, the USA army commander then in person of 5-star Major General Richard order the first usage of atomic weapon on Hiroshima- which wiped out 90% of the Japanese army based. If one is to agree with the prompt of this issue one will say that it was because of the war demand at hand that initiate the retaliation but let not forget that the atomic bomb was not make in two days. The press conferences hold by USA president of that time stated that the atomic bomb even though used for the first time in Hiroshima has been in production for many eyes. This example shows that the weapon used to win the battle against Japanese army was not made under 24hours by the demand of the nature of the war. It was a graduate process that take many researchers years to come up it. Therefore, showing that for there to be productive or a successful leader one need year of preparation, determination and development.
Furthermore, a one man cannot make a forest. We all need one another to learn, develop, overcome challenges and create effective solution to the matter at hand, all these qualities are the one that make a great leader. Prof. John, the 2023 novel award winner in medicine developed interest in molecular when she was living with his uncle in Australia and did his elementary to master level schooling there. After which he moved to Penn State University for his PhD. Even though majority of people thought that his lab’s novel discovery was concede in the Penn state University after his graduate, during his position a post Prof. in Prof Mathew lab. His interview with BBC news says otherwise, in fact the interest was developed during his time in Australia with his undergraduate thesis supervisor. Who they both won the award together. The approach that leads to the discovery was made by the synergy of both lab methodology. Hereby showcase the important of connection built over time in executing task at hand. This example shows that even though the need for his discovery, hypotheses, and aim were of great urgency, the connection he made over time allowed him to execute it well and make novel findings.
Conclusively, while the prompt argue that USA Covid-19 case was not as worst as some other Asia country because of the strict major placed by the USA government at that time. Some of which are, the use of noise mask, good hand hygiene, regular testing, among many other. But let not forget that all these materials were not first discover during this period. Noise mask for example was developed in 2015 involving 15 years of failed experiments before it was achieved. Even though it was made public at that movement, it was not developed or created at that time. Hereby showing the important of stages of development.
Therefore, a good and affective leader can’t be created by the demands they were faced with, a good leader is built by constant developed which take times to achieve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tried'.
Suggestion: tried
...ne- many researchers in the work I have try to define the meaning of leader and how...
^^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ent numbers of professional to complete a beautify story build. Building a house that will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'conceded'.
Suggestion: conceded
...ught that his lab’s novel discovery was concede in the Penn state University after his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...th his undergraduate thesis supervisor. Who they both won the award together. The a...
^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...od hand hygiene, regular testing, among many other. But let not forget that all these mate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the important of stages of development. Therefore, a good and affective leader c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, likewise, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 30.0 11.3162921348 265% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 106.0 58.6224719101 181% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3754.0 2235.4752809 168% => OK
No of words: 796.0 442.535393258 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71608040201 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.31163552584 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50978741185 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 363.0 215.323595506 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456030150754 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1208.7 704.065955056 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 40.0 20.2370786517 198% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6005759357 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.85 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145972571757 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346770158366 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392401868643 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102893552464 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046274548998 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.