The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises a very delicate issue whether the opulence of life hinders the strong and independent growth of the human beings or does it help in the process. Indisputably, there are occurrences where there is too much of pampering done to the child. Nevertheless, I would not agree with the above stated contention of the author, and would argue that the conveniences and luxuries provides assistance in the process of the strengthening people.
Firstly, the luxuries and the conveniences of the life are the very purpose for which the person works hard and still might not get them. Thus, the luxury provides one with the motivation to strive and thus, in a way helps a person to grow strong and independent. To illustrate, let us take an example of the students of college. Their struggle is for these opulence and conveniences of the life. For this purpose, they tend to score better grades which provides them with the strong asset of abilities with the help of which they become independent person in life.
Secondly, the conveniences provides us with the better and the smart ways of conducting a task and so, it is a useful in making us stronger. To exemplify, what is the use of all these luxuries and conveniences if, one struggles in order to properly use them. So, only possessing of a mere thing does not give indication about how properly one can use that, given the situation. Therefore, the luxuries and the conveniences also helps in making the mental abilities stronger in such a manner.
There are also some accounts where the too much much of cosseting, hinders the overall transformation from the children to the strong and dynamic personality. But, it may as well be noted, that, though they tend to have a finicky nature, these people always finds a way to finish a certain task sluggishly. Thus, in a way they also developed the strength of completing a task howsoever, difficult it may be.
To conclude, the assertion of the author that the luxuries and conveniences hinders to human beings in a way to transform into a robust personality, is indefensible. It rather contradicts to the overwhelming evidence that the opulence of thew life assists in the progress of the human beings. Hence, until some measurements are token, or some cases are considered the above conclusion that the opulence of life helps in the making of a strong human personality holds credit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | ayush.45 | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Varun Gohil | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 66
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, f 54
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 50
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this opulence' or 'these opulences'?
Suggestion: this opulence; these opulences
...dents of college. Their struggle is for these opulence and conveniences of the life. For this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the mental abilities stronger in such a manner. There are also some accounts wh...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: much
...re are also some accounts where the too much much of cosseting, hinders the overall trans...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203090507726 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.139072847682 0.157235817809 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0728476821192 0.0880659088768 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0662251655629 0.0497285424764 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.037527593819 0.0444667217837 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119205298013 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0286975717439 0.0406280797675 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84793746133 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0309050772627 0.030933414821 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.150110375276 0.0997080785238 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0132450331126 0.0249443105267 53% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0154525386313 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2399.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 409.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86552567237 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317848410758 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232273838631 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18826405868 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119804400978 0.132149295362 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84793746133 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464547677262 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.1166745181 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7222222222 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9033768486 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.277777778 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.674092028746 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.9496060853 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.44545454545 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484171892232 0.391690518653 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14080006275 0.123202303941 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0875483216544 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.629785960218 0.547984918172 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117915267278 0.149214159877 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230673043807 0.161403998019 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10279839797 0.0892212321368 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.46938840532 0.385218514788 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108946529031 0.0692045440612 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353398891316 0.275328986314 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786188012983 0.0653680567796 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.