The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Whether the main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that we human beings now are prominently different from those before can be weighted in many aspects. With some qualification, I fundamentally agree with the statement.
There is a main qualification: dispelling the illusion is the process not the end. People benefited from the abstaining the illusion because of the learning of avoiding faults happening in earlier times, but not the abstaining itself.
Aside with the overinterpretation, I agree that the illusion is really existing. Many people argue that the modern situation is disparate with the primitive for that technology advances, and the living way is totally different on communication, traffic, finance. Yet it is spurious. The structure of society admittedly might not be same, but the stem doesn't change. The minds of humanity are unlikely malleable. People's empathy and apathy, avarice and generosity remain as the time elapses. And they boost the actions of the world.
If we have the illusion, we might believe that it is unworthy to study from history, and might do the wrong things again and again. We can see many tragedies repeat, such as wars. We should admit bad side of humanity that we are as greed and apathetic as our ancestors, so that we can face the nature and build law and policy to eschew the sadness.
To sum up, aside from the overinterpretation that dispelling the illusion that people living now and in the early time are disparate can mainly benefit human beings, I fundamentally agree that the illusion is existing. By banish this, we will learn much from the history and benefit from the learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | raghavchauhan619 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | AmieeZhao | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | maryle | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should buy the products made in their own country 73
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one is the most useful A plant trees and create parks B persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers C increase access to public transporta 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether the main benefit of the study of histor...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ittedly might not be same, but the stem doesnt change. The minds of humanity are unlik...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 278.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04316546763 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90488951708 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7287569154 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.625 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286915948423 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851408631049 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826383449576 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177569079535 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918007742576 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.