Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
The given statement emphasises on 'un-equalness' or Inequality among men and women. It also states that carrer choices and social status must be limited because of the person's gender. This statement does contain several assumptions and flaws. Firstly, it assumes that since a person was born with certain gender or certain body, he/she is not elegible for certain type of work and their social duties should be limited by those factors, the factors which they can't have any control over.
In the 21st century, it is a generally expected norm in many societies that both men and women are suited for all types of jobs and what actually matters is the person's skills and abilities. Though, many societies still believe that since man and women have their inherent physical differences, it is not possible for them to have equal job opportunities, which is not true. The most practical approach about gender equality has been in place in the Norwegian countries, which has served as an ideal to other countries.
It has been observed and noted during many psycological and social research that, even if men and women are provided with equal opportunities, they tend to have inclination to certain professions and have certain field of intrests, in general. This phenomena can even be observed around us, it can be observed that even if men and women are provided with equal opporutnties, in most cases, they end up selecting a field of intrest which has been typical for the specific gender.
According to many psycology researchers and psycologists, even if men and women are provided with equal opportunities, men tend to end up selecting professions or field of intrests which involve study of 'things', whereas women end up selcting field of intrests which involve study related to 'people'. This can be realized as, we can observe, a majority of persons studying Engineering or a related field are men, whereas the opposite is true for women, i.e. most of the persons studying a science which involves studying social structures of our society or a study related to human body or a related field are women.
To conclude, it would be appropriate to say that, both men and women are suited for all kinds of professions aand jobs, a person's gender should not decide wheather a person is elegible for certin job or not. It should be purely based on one's own choice, what profession the person wants to pursue. Therefore, it would be fair to say that both men and women are suited for all types of tasks.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 54 | view |
2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 50 | view |
2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 79
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 58
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 84
- some people say advertising is extremely success cult in persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it 67
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y those factors, the factors which they cant have any control over. In the 21st...
^^^^
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which they cant have any control over. In the 21st century, it is a generally e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... certain field of intrests, in general. This phenomena can even be observed around u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, in general, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89671361502 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6191713633 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457746478873 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1673755714 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290628336801 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110105656129 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770681772913 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168544747875 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642921575395 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.