The society and biology have two different criteria for classifying the men and women. In contrast to the biological differences, society differentiates the men and women based on a myriad number of factors. The preceding claim talks about the ineptness of women to perform the same task as men due to their inherent physical differences. Taking a stand for this claim, the evidences needed for substantiating my point of view are stated below.
Firstly, women can't be tantamount to men in executing many tasks. For example, taking an example of the construction business, this requires onerous effort and men are superior to women in strength. To carry tons of weight on their shoulders is definitely arduous and women lack the strength in executing the same task. While women can be seen working in the same field, the tasks assigned to women are not similiar to the tasks assigned to men due to the innate physical differences.
Additionally, quoting another example in agriculture, men are more suited to drive the tractors rather than women. The reason behind this might be attributed as follows: the tractors are very sturdy and require a lot of effort to control the direction in which the tractors move across the field. While considering the fact that women can be good drivers to complete the same task, in terms of handling tractors, men have proved to be more efficient.
Thirdly, while women have proved to be efficient in a few tasks, these tasks tend to be more 'women-centric' as the society terms it to be. Cooking can be categorized as one such women-centric task. However, men are no less and tend to be deft at cooking too and can perform the same task efficiently. Some tasks have also been generalized to be male-centric. For instance, the job of electricians is mostly up for grab by the men and this field seems to be dominated by men. Why does this happen? Men are said to be more agile in climbing up the poles and fixing the problems due to which men are preferred for such tasks.
Taking into consideration of the fact that women have proved as equals in the society ranging from tasks like technology to arts, due to a few inherent physical differences, certain tasks are more suitable for men and least likely for women. This doesn't overlook the adroit capabilities of women but gives men a wider range of tasks they can be a part of.
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 49
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...iew are stated below. Firstly, women cant be tantamount to men in executing many ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...or men and least likely for women. This doesnt overlook the adroit capabilities of wom...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, third, thirdly, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78832116788 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72375490085 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476885644769 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0175233291 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.55 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243329127279 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902076540316 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475034512983 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158148731349 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256023528502 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.