"A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."
There is still some doubt about international curriculum, that is, it is better for students' improvement or not. To some extent, studying different nations' curriculum is more qualified so that students improves themselves in many professional ways, in engineering, architecture, philosophy and more. On the other hand, this may weaken their information about their own history, science, art. In my opinion, it is more rational to provide also different nations curriculum in education system.
Firstly, when in high school, students find really hard to choose their fields. Studying different programs may give them more creative ideas. Discovering yourselves starts with seeing further cultures and then you search to see whether it fits your personality better or not. In this way, you can analyze your opportunity costs and advantages. For example, studying in a french high school may provide you a french discipline and you realize french philosophy is best fit for your future. To clarify, giving standardized education can create prototype individuals without any curiosity, passion or ambition.
Secondly, in some sectors, it is better for professionality to study abroad. For example, in engineering, it is advantage to study in german technical universities since you get education from best engineers and you can catch up with new technologies easily. However, if they study only their nation curriculum, it gets harder to adapt german discipline when they go to a college there. That is, sometimes more qualification requires diversity in education and providing different education systems can improve their orientation power.
In conclusion, it is important to include different education system for students to get ready for college life in future. They become more aware of other alternatives and possible difficulties. In addition, they can become more professional and determined in their jobs with more skills and qualifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | rookobay | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | LAGADAPATI VINAY | 33 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | zanzendegi | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | poiuy23567 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Eeshan | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 70
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 61
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. “According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in 58
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 16
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including tel 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...not. To some extent, studying different nations curriculum is more qualified so that st...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...more rational to provide also different nations curriculum in education system. Firs...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... students to get ready for college life in future. They become more aware of other altern...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59259259259 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07670791169 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3789170473 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7058823529 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153965709464 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543390158316 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555458752903 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10250587778 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412943222678 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.