Applying rules and laws precisely, is certainly the hot-button issue of the moment. Hence, such topic raises the controversial issue whether nations ought to pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their states. Indisputably, about the importance of presence multi natures in the same country. Nevertheless, some people are debated the importance of presences the wild areas in their countries. Thus, I generally agree that government has to pass a law in order to protect the wild life. So, to substantiate my case the following essay will illustrate my position.
To begin with, the first and the foremost point coming to the mind is the importance of saving the Eco-system by protecting all the system components. In other words I would like to point out that there is a concrete and strong relation that link all the system components with each other, so presences the wild life is a crucial part of the chain. To illustrate, one vivid example is the wild trees and its role in balancing the environment by producing the oxygen that is mandatory for all people lives. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that from the first point the importance of preserving the wild life.
Moreover, the second vital point that should be taken into consideration is by saving and regulating the wild life, the government will be able to burgeon the economic status. Specifically, that will attract tourists from everywhere. Further illustration taking the Jordanian government as a striking example, Jordan as a small country with limited resources, they have to think how to flourish the economic status by stating rules and regulations to protect such WADI RAM, Petra, dead see, and a lot of wild places, and the end result was millions of dollars within short period of time and without huge efforts.
Admittedly, if there are opponents argue that nations should not pass a law in order to save the wild life is completely unreliable. stating laws will save myriad numbers and species of animals and plants. One fact is, without laws every one will have the right to hunt any animals without limit and will have a right to cut uncountable numbers of trees in order to build more houses or factories. So, it is hard to accepted their opinion toward the wild life.
In conclusion, and due to aforementioned reasons and examples, passing law is a great idea to save the wild life in general and implementing it will lead to positive consequence on both people and the wild life.
- Nowadays universities are the best place to get the best knowledge from it . also , it became an important part of our life in spite of taking valuable information from many different fields , we face many new experience we do not face it before . further 70
- What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open-but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about a 75
- tpo 22 70
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortance of preserving the wild life. Moreover, the second vital point that sh...
^^^
Line 6, column 574, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lt was millions of dollars within short period of time and without huge efforts. Admittedly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Stating
...the wild life is completely unreliable. stating laws will save myriad numbers and speci...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, in general, in short, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95476190476 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76414010527 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6804727167 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143955180902 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048580930129 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537529296128 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807112079656 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499516663826 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.