Clearly a government's funding is limited and should be rationed according to importance. When comparing the arts and a basic necessity such as food, the choice is obvious. A government should indeed put basic fundamental and physiological needs of the people first. However, the author's statement is extreme and overlooks the other various components of society that are funded by the government. These areas should similarly be similarly addressed. In times of need, funding should indeed be reallocated, but not exclusively from the arts.
However important art may be to any particular individual, its value is subjective. Moreover, art is not absolutely necessary to survive. It is reasonable to make the conclusion that funding should be taken away from art and redirected when there is a critical need, but there are many other funded areas we should explore. One applicable area of questionable government funding resides in the military branch of any government. This is especially holds true outside of wartime. Once can logically argue that without food, individuals will not survive. And without a surviving or thriving populace, there will not be anything left for the military to protect. When looking at a country like North Korea, it is easy to see the results of a government that prioritizes military strength over individual well-being. The presence of poverty and starvation is widespread, all at the cost of advanced weaponization. In this case, reallocation of spending is clearly and ethically warranted.
Perhaps a more controversial example is the presidential use of government funding. When assessing recent years, president Donald Trump has been criticized for his prodigal use of national finances. From taking expensive private jet tours, to extravagant weekend golf getaways. The total summation of these unnecessary spending are substantial when compared to other nonessential funding. If the government's prioritization truly lies with the health of people, the spread of wealth would be more equal.
Conclusively, when the well-being of the population suffers, it is the government's responsibility to reassess spending needs. It is clearly reasonable to demand less spending in nonessential areas in efforts to combat hunger and poverty. Some areas, such as art, are among these less essential categories. However, there are a significant number of other areas that should be critically analyzed when determining suspension and reallocation of funding.
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 54
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 50
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both 55
- "Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make a 66
- In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famous for our special bargains, raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improve profits. Last mon 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...needs of the people first. However, the authors statement is extreme and overlooks the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...lue is subjective. Moreover, art is not absolutely necessary to survive. It is reasonable to make th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...d to other nonessential funding. If the governments prioritization truly lies with the heal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e spread of wealth would be more equal. Conclusively, when the well-being of the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ng of the population suffers, it is the governments responsibility to reassess spending nee...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53926701571 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13713502798 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8979873973 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.64 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.28 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.96 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171835965835 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446332559925 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359423597974 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107332742339 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151358787479 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.