As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The claim regarding pros and cons of technology development have been heatedly discussed. I agree that there are certain adverse points in the advancement of science and technology in that we become lazy and over-dependent on machines, and people are prone to have deteorioation of communication skills and human connection. Nonetheless, this argument minimises the significance of how we are positively influenced by the improved technology.
On the one hand, some individual argue that the technological development has engendered people becoming reluctant to engage in doing works and lazy. As a vivid example, since the introduction of laundry machine, the majority of people hardly try to learn manual method of cleaning clothes. Additionally, compared to the past when library was the main source of academic information, it is rarely used for the reason now, because of the internet. Furthermore, the technology advancement brought about noxious effects on human interaction and their social behaviour. Over time the most of us make use of social media, involve in computer or mobile games or associate with others online. During the course, many start losing communication skills needed for the colloquial conversation and developing antisocial behaviours.
While these negative aspects devaluate the meaning of technology improvement, there are certainly overstriding benefits from it. First of all, we can take advantage of computers, mobile phones, automated factory, by which our working performance and efficiency have been greatly enhanced. To elucidate further on this example, computer enabled us to create documents in no time and correspond with business counterparts who live in other continentals. Secondly, we benefit from sophisticated technology for our economic growth, quality of life, housing, infrastructure etc. Delving into them, transport facilities such as roads, cars has accelerated the traffic flow across the country or between the nations, which have helped national and international trade and market. Moreover, agricultural intesification was attributed to the development of agricultural machinery, chemical fertiliser or pesticides and so on.
The above arguments bespeak that the technology development can create both merits and dismerits. While it is certainly true that we are also negatively affected by it, however we also are given tremendous benefits from it for improved national development, living standards and the like. Therefore, we should aim for investing more on technology advancement and maximizing its contribution to our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- to understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 16
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 48
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 49
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 54
- It is primarily through our social identification with social group that we define ourselves. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78385416667 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22238766768 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630208333333 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6357169282 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.388888889 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146009750228 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415534647727 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287222055709 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864133057588 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139558163961 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 48.8420337079 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.