As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate
History has been inundated with the evolutions, inventions and discoveries all intrigued by the unfathomable thinking power of human brain. Technologies are no exception - emerged by years of analysis and tenacity of human experts. thus the notion that people will deteriorate their thinking ability due to over reliance on technologies is not acceptable.
None of the technologies emerged by themselves, but are the results of human ideologies and experimentations. Graham Bell invented the very first telephone sizing about a table, today with rigorous advancement and upgrade all because of human thinking ability is able fit in pocket and is called "smart phone". If people abjured thinking about such improvements smart phones would be considered as alliens.
Human minds have innate ability to think when they are struck by problems. when people are besieged by unprecedented problems they use their latent creativity to find a solution which ultimately turns into a technology. For example, cave men used peripatetic mode of travel even miles, the same men invented stone wheels making transportation faster and easier and today we have self-driving cars requiring minimal human interventions. this shows that human have continuous thinking ability for advancement of life.
Moreover as the technology emerges into its prime stage, the competition among the concerned groups increase, the goal of being the best of the rest. this leads to tremendous research about the technology - exacting incisive thinking power. For example Apple Incorporation every year release the more better smartphone models than ever, to overcome its product Samsung comes up with more better technology thus reflecting how capable is human of thinking.
Admittedly conceding to the technologies by over relying on it has exacerbated human abilities of problem solving. For example our parents are more powerful in mental maths calculations and even better decision takers compared to latest generation, caught into adverse effects of gaming technologies and lacking aptitude of practical problem solving.
In conclusion technology indeed changed the way of life, making it easier and better however over dependence to technology is egregious.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 83
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 43
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 83
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. “According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in 32
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...analysis and tenacity of human experts. thus the notion that people will deteriorate...
^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...analysis and tenacity of human experts. thus the notion that people will deteriorate...
^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...think when they are struck by problems. when people are besieged by unprecedented pr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...think when they are struck by problems. when people are besieged by unprecedented pr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... requiring minimal human interventions. this shows that human have continuous thinki...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ing ability for advancement of life. Moreover as the technology emerges into its prim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...the goal of being the best of the rest. this leads to tremendous research about the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...le Incorporation every year release the more better smartphone models than ever, to overcom...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...rcome its product Samsung comes up with more better technology thus reflecting how capable ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...nd even better decision takers compared to latest generation, caught into adverse effects...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68545994065 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01920250212 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617210682493 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2566687734 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353537425047 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109838704826 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643059523725 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160165197573 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526600908632 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.