As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is truth that contemporary people depend heavily on the vast implication of technology in a wide range of fields in their lifestyle. Some experts assert that this important intertaction among the humans and the technology is leading to the decline of the humans ability to rely on their powers to overcome the difficulties. On the other hand, prominent scientists on the realm of sociology contend that thechnology has assisted greatly the human kind to conduct and execute sophisticated projects and the technology just enchances the operation of human mind by providing the necessary tools. It is my personal belief that techonogy does not decline the capability of humans to innovate and solve their problems but it consist an extolled mean in the hands of humans to advance their skills and abilities.
However, on deeper analysis, someone could easily detect specific human operation in the daily lifestyle which indeed demonstrate that technology has actually deteriote the operation of human mind. People rely on more and more to the various applications of tecnology to not waste valuable time and devote this time in more important things like more time with friends and family. For instance, the vast application of web-banking assisted people to execute their financial arrangements easily and fast without being obligated to waste so many hours at bank stores.
On the other hand, the state-of-the art technology which is widely iplemented, requires advanced skills and enhanced way of thinking. These sophisticated applications demand a lot of informations
To conclude up, of course the ubiquitous appliance of technology has decreased the participation of human mind in some specific tasks in our lives, however the tecnology provides all the necessary tools to human kind to enhance its capabilities and skills and conduct sophisticated projects.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nology is leading to the decline of the humans ability to rely on their powers to over...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 723, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists'?
Suggestion: consists
...nnovate and solve their problems but it consist an extolled mean in the hands of humans...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires advanced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'advancing' or 'to be advanced'.
Suggestion: advancing; to be advanced
...gy which is widely iplemented, requires advanced skills and enhanced way of thinking. Th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pplications demand a lot of informations To conclude up, of course the ubiquitous...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38566552901 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96588798072 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8481607343 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.333333333 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194300316237 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776360780544 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415646398241 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103012820304 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542445482835 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 48.8420337079 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nology is leading to the decline of the humans ability to rely on their powers to over...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 723, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists'?
Suggestion: consists
...nnovate and solve their problems but it consist an extolled mean in the hands of humans...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires advanced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'advancing' or 'to be advanced'.
Suggestion: advancing; to be advanced
...gy which is widely iplemented, requires advanced skills and enhanced way of thinking. Th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pplications demand a lot of informations To conclude up, of course the ubiquitous...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38566552901 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96588798072 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8481607343 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.333333333 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194300316237 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776360780544 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415646398241 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103012820304 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542445482835 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 48.8420337079 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.