As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Emergence of techonoloy is inevitable, with people's dependence of technology to solve problems increasing rapdily. Does that imply that the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate? Some people surely would say that it'll deteriorate, but a more thoughtful, comprehensive evaluation of the situation would change their opinions. There is no denying that people are relying more and more on technology and it's a auspicious situation to be in.
First and foremost, the insatiable hunger to technological advancements capable of solving more sophisticated and intricate problems of our mundane life is pushing people all over the would to look for more and more ingenious solutions and paradigms. This, to say the least, is helping people expand their thinking and knowledge, which in no sense deteriorating the ability of human to think of themselve. Arguably, it will only help people make better decisions, as time spent on solving intricate problems push our intellectual horizons.
Secondly, the time saved due to technological advancements is mammoth to say the least. With many of our quotidian task automated, we can better utilize our time and focus on stuff of primacy. Washing machine to do our laundary, motor vehicle to help us travel long distances in relatively short times, productivity tools like spell and grammar check to avoid embarrassing mistakes are helpful, many saving us time, some helping us become more productive.
However, some people would argue that technology is deteriorating our thinking citing examples like people's inability to do basic stuff like mathematical calculations etc. Well, I do agree that too much on blind reliance on technology is deterrent to our thinking ability. Even seemingly simple stuff like navigating city would seem daunting in the absence of technology, if everything fails. This is bound to have detrimental effects on our intellect, and might even end up deteriorating our ability to think for ourselves.
In conclusing, I would like to say that technology is both boon and bane. However, looking at its multitude of benifits, I'm more inclined to say that it's more boon than bane. Used appropriately, avoiding too much reliance, is definitely a propitious to the interest of humanking.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 83
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers havetherefore suggested that R 71
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 60
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 83
- Claim The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Reason Great achievements by a nation s rulers artists or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation s people Write a respons 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...relying more and more on technology and its a auspicious situation to be in. Fir...
^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing more and more on technology and its a auspicious situation to be in. First...
^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
..., looking at its multitude of benifits, Im more inclined to say that its more boon...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35933147632 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05631077099 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554317548747 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2742811077 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.176470588 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292186501664 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1001915086 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860809092277 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170279343623 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12027613656 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.