As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your the reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans are known to evolve, and with the increase in evolution technology also advances. The prompt states that the ability of humans to think for themselves decreases with an increase in technology. In my opinion, I moderately agree with this statement and argue that to some extent this condition may be true for the following three reasons.
Firstly, without the involvement of machines, some tasks become difficult. For instance, space crafts are used to explore space and retrieve information about space, so these require lengthy and hard calculations which could be easily computed without any errors, this avoidance of mistakes increases the reliability of humans on machines and promotes their usage.
Secondly, people become more lethargic as there would be less work to be done to them. For instance, people are known to be vigilant while doing tasks but with the introduction of machines, responsibility decreases which in turn increases dependency on machines, as humans are known to evolve with respect to their surroundings their problem solving might be decreased as it is not being used.
Lastly, humans need a high level of problem-solving in order to develop a technology capable of solving problems. For instance, Artificial intelligence is a quite complex technology that requires more skills to develop, those skills include problem-solving and also in order to maintain a technology of such complexity more human intelligence is needed, so developing technology might not affect the problem-solving skill of a human.
In conclusion, some may argue against this statement but the main thing is that developing technology does not mean that humans' problem-solving skills decrease as they would have to maintain them as well.
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 33
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 54
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park and there were abu 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 274.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41605839416 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03323976126 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.9976343785 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.4 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.21951772744 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271728079407 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110072784276 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596229741244 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143573400224 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680285785067 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 274.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41605839416 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03323976126 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.9976343785 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.4 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.21951772744 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271728079407 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110072784276 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596229741244 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143573400224 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680285785067 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.