As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate
I don't wholly agree with the stated issue, but I would rather say that technology has its fair share of pros and cons. It has its advantages and disadvantages.
Technology has definitely been a boon for mankind seeing the technological progress in many countries on a large scale. Humans previously had to physically visit a person just to talk to them. Imagine the time and cost that we are saving now, compared to that when a person would have had to spend his resources, money, and time just to meet a person who is in another country. Nowadays we can just talk with whoever we want to, with a simple phone call. Technology has brought communities together. It doesn't matter what part of the globe you lie on You can connect, and share your ideas and thoughts with people regardless of where they reside. Technology has given us a platform to put forth our ideas to millions and millions of people living around the world and thus make a positive impact.
And as everyone knows, everything has its pros and cons. Same is the case with technology. There has been research that says that in a few years the attention span of a human being will be lesser than a goldfish, which is about 5 seconds. And the culprit for this is none other than technology. Humans have started being addicted to their phones so much that for every other task, they depend on it. The amount of processing power in phones, and the number of applications that try to make human life easier, have in a way stopped us from taking steps involving hard work to achieve our day-to-day tasks. We have started relying on technology so much that we now need to use a calculator to do simple calculations that we could've easily done in our school days. It is technology, that is keeping people glued to their screens instead of interacting with the person sitting right beside them.
If this continues for the next 10 or 20 years, it might happen that the future generations of humans will be physiologically lesser developed or less capable human beings then what we are now. And the only way to stop this is by self control. That is the only way we can ensure that we don't use technology for each and every small task that we need to complete, but only for the ones that require a significant amount of resources or finances.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints recei 69
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont wholly agree with the stated issue, but...
^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...gy has brought communities together. It doesnt matter what part of the globe you lie o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t is the only way we can ensure that we dont use technology for each and every small...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56763285024 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52947916318 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538647342995 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1963299513 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.55 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135189806324 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03898938438 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032562691474 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786380222072 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295553276935 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.