People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is popularly believed that persons who are most profoundly committed to a concept or ideal tend to be critical to it. Although this idea has some supportive evidences in particular when we have a deal with scientists, it may be easily refuted if we take a closer look at religious zealots who are unwilling to accept even the most glaring facts which are in conflict with their faith. Thus, an act of devotion may lead to two opposing consequences: if a person wants to improve and refine his or her concept, one will be most critical to the idea; however, if one is blindly committed to an ideal or belief, he or she will not be able to critically look at it.
First of all, one of the best examples of people who are deeply committed to an idea and at the same time who are the most picky about it are scholars. Scientific research has a goal of learning about the nature and universe and the truth is the biggest treasury of it. Consequently, they are able to unbiasedly scrutiny their ideas and basis of them. For instance, Albert Einstein, who created the theory of relativity which has changed the way by which we perceive the world, initially made a mistake in his calculations. After the mistake was found, Einstein was willing to accept the critique and refine his work. The ability of pundits to accept evidences and critique is caused by their devotion to the idea and desire to improve it.
However, when we have dealing with religion the situation is dramatically different. Throughout history we may find evidences that religious devotion to an idea blinded believers in their ability to critically analyze facts which are in confrontation with their point of view. For instance, the holy inquisition and its refusal to accept the convincing evidences that the sun is the center of the solar system and that our planet is orbiting the star. You may think that it is our past and today religious believers who completely committed to their ideas cannot possibly behave in such a way but look at their attitude to Darwin's theory of evolution. Despite the plethora of evidences which were found under ground and tomes of carefully collected information about species and their development; these people refuse to accept them. The possible reason of this situation may be that they are committed to the faith and religion asks its followers to blindly accept and do not doubt.
In conclusion, although deep commitment to an idea may lead, in some cases, to a critical perception of the idea, it is not an absolute rule and sometimes blind devotion leads to mindless and uncritical acceptation of an idea.
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes, which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated, are far more successful than are other methods at deterring che 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 80
- 09/10/2017Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means; others believe that these games are contributing to children’s development.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 50
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors."Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in many food s 70
- young people should be encouraged to pursue long term goals, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning 50
Comments
Hello. Thank you for your
Hello. Thank you for your help. I would like that you give me some suggestions how I can improve my essays. I cannot manage to acquire a score higher than 4. What should I improve in order to get higher score? I will be glad to receive any recommendation. Thank you.
First, you will need to focus
First, you will need to focus on one side only (suppose it is side A). Even though you can leave one paragraph for another side (suppose it is side B), the goal of the support is still for the side A.
Second, it is related to the language.
most of your essays are like this:
No. of Words: 455 while No. of Different Words: 210
We are expecting:
No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
------------------------
for issue essays, you may read essays by this user:
http://www.testbig.com/users/sauvikb
Thank you for your help. I
Thank you for your help. I will study examples which you recommend me for reading.
Sentence: Consequently, they are able to unbiasedly scrutiny their ideas and basis of them.
Error: unbiasedly Suggestion: ?
flaws:
Well, better to put two paragraphs for the side you want to support. If you take a middle-of-the-road approach you won’t sound as confident or clear.
------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 455 350
No. of Characters: 2125 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.619 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.67 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.615 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.438 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.107 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5