People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Criticizing a plan or policy may be much easier than doing that job. Critics could see an issue in idealistic views and attack the disadvantages. The prompt claims that people who are committed in planning or implementing a project or idea are less likely to have critical view on that. This prompt is intricate and has various views that should be considered. However, I mostly agree with this prompt and I explain my reasons.
First of all, the people, who are involved in planning a policy, could reflect their ideas in the policy. They can criticize the policy before publicly propagate. Thus, they could show their ideas and change the policy as much as possible and it means the policy is aligned with their thoughts to some extent. For instance, Obama's cabinet members, the former president of the United States, were involved in Obama health care program. This program established by different experts who reflect the cabinet's members and was approved after months of evaluation. Therefore, the program mostly reflects the cabinet's ideas and they have rarely, even any, critical views on this program, even after more than four years.
Moreover, when people are involved in a project, they would be aware of difficulties and limitations of implementation of the project. They distance from idealistic views and face realistic ones. Thus, before they criticize the project, they would consider the conditions of the project. For example, project staffs of a bridge on a Karon river, in Iran, are aware of the environmental, economic, and social issue of the projects. So, they may rarely have critical ideas about delay in the project because they know payment by the government had delay for several months that affects on time schedule of the project.
On the other hand, some may claim due to the fact that people who committed in project are vigilant of the detail of the project, so they know defects of it properly and know what changes could improve it. For instance, in aforementioned projects, designers and constructors of the projects, as were involved in the project, can provide some suggestion that improve the performance of the project. Or on the contrary, they know the weak points of the project that can mentioned.
In conclusion, this prompt is presented a complicated issue that we can investigate in several views. Although, some may reckon the people who are involved in an idea or project could have more critical views on it, I believe they more likely to support them due to awareness of limitations and difficulties of implementation of a project or policy.
- Some think that young people should be free to choose any career they like while others say that they should think more realistically about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Alcohol related deaths 2005 and average beer consumption Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagram Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050
- “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.” Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 58
- Some people feel that there is too much emphasis on getting an education and that governments should spend money on leisure time activities for young people too To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00925925926 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71823530163 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456018518519 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6120184987 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.047619048 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123663656394 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447817505334 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398232115612 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794081609981 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436660660816 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.