People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Decision is in itself an outcome after a careful consideration of all the options and then opting the one that is most suitable. While, the decision based on emotions can't be considered rational as emotions can't be quantified and therefore can't judged.
The primary reason for that makes these decision maker poor is the state in which the decision was made. As we can clearly see that the mental state of person when he or she is highly emotional is very unstable as compared to a steady mental state. A mother seeing his child cry makes her forgive the mistakes done by the child. But repetition of this action will lead to a worse future not only for the child but also for the mother.
The mood swings that one encounter, might sway the decision in opposite direction. Although at that moment it might seem right but as you get back to your normal state, you might not feel the same way. Seeing a beggar one might feel an immense urge to give him some money, but then afterwards one might feel guilty when one tries to justify it with logic. While you may have helped him, but as a matter of fact you just gave him a positive reinforcement with act of begging.
Emotion sometimes stops you from thinking about a decision thoroughly. It makes you nearsighted. After seeing a biopic about Mother Teresa you might have a sudden rush of giving up your pleasure and get in the service of mankind. But after doing the service for some days you might feel to revert. As now you have come to a steady emotional state and logically this judgement does not feel right for you.
Although taking a decision based on emotion might not always be bad for you. As this part itself separate us from the machines, our ability to feel the emotions. Ignoring emotions just makes us no different from the automated robots. Seeing a bully, one might get the emotion of stopping him. On the other hand one might rationalize that he is mightier and there's no point in going against him.
So it might be better to think logically before taking a decision in most cases. As it would be a carefully looked thought. But sometimes adding the partiality of emotions might also not be that bad.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition 54
- The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the land 50
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity 50
- Techno corporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a stellite technology has been approvd by the FTA to compete with current 50
- The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... While, the decision based on emotions cant be considered rational as emotions cant...
^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...cant be considered rational as emotions cant be quantified and therefore cant judged...
^^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...otions cant be quantified and therefore cant judged. The primary reason for that ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stops you from thinking about a decision thoroughly. It makes you nearsighted. Af...
^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ght rationalize that he is mightier and theres no point in going against him. So it...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...before taking a decision in most cases. As it would be a carefully looked thought....
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'as a matter of fact', 'in most cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.172985781991 0.240241500013 72% => OK
Verbs: 0.170616113744 0.157235817809 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0734597156398 0.0880659088768 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0687203791469 0.0497285424764 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0805687203791 0.0444667217837 181% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130331753555 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0592417061611 0.0406280797675 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.34622743213 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021327014218 0.030933414821 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00236966824645 0.0016655270985 142% => OK
Determiners: 0.116113744076 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0379146919431 0.0249443105267 152% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00947867298578 0.0148568991511 64% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2178.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55612244898 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.303571428571 0.366273622748 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.188775510204 0.280924506359 67% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.140306122449 0.200843997647 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0663265306122 0.132149295362 50% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34622743213 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502551020408 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 54.7525311196 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0434782609 23.380412469 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4627634203 59.4972553346 53% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6956521739 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0434782609 23.380412469 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 35.9210292813 51.4728631049 70% => OK
Elegance: 1.13333333333 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0827765886583 0.391690518653 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109754947501 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0678434566505 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.512751344631 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.097536726556 0.149214159877 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319752906771 0.161403998019 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380366081269 0.0892212321368 43% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267325955199 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0549042366808 0.0692045440612 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533530189244 0.275328986314 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027811683144 0.0653680567796 43% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.