People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
With decision making comes great responsibility for a person. A person has to make decisions whether it is related to his/her life or related to others. Therefore, the decision made should be logical and not ambiguous. However, people who make decisions based on their emotions are rather impulsive or are weak-hearted. Therefore, I concur with the author's view that those who make decisions based on their emotions and justify with logic after making decisions are poor decision makers.
On the first facet, If we consider a politician, people of the country have chosen him/her for making decisions for the betterment of the people and the country. However, if he makes a decision only on the basis of his emotions and later when the decision has gone wrong or gone right justifying it with logic is not acceptable. With great power comes great responsibility. For example, A president of the country is the highest authority and people have chosen him/her because they trust his/her foresight. They believe that he can handle the situation well and will consider all the situations before making any decision. However, if he makes a decision driven by emotions and later justifying it with logic is not acceptable.
Moreover, if a person is making decisions with analyzing all the merits and demerits of that situation then rate of failure of those decisions will surely decline. That person will excel towards his/her goals more accurately. It will also define one's nature of handling pressure situations and make decisions that will benefit him and as well as other people that are involved in those decisions. A person who is making a decision based on his/her emotions can lead to dwindling his image as a leader.
Additionally, there are some situations when a person makes a decision in outrage and to show other people what he can do. But, that can lead to his disadvantage only. For example, a boy who is very good in studies. And his friends tease him that he is not a good rugby player. If he takes a decision because of resentment and devotes more time in playing rugby and to prove a point that is out of his comfort zone it will badly affect his studies.
In the crux, the author's view that people who make a decision based on emotions are poor decision makers is true. And later justifying it with logic is like they are hiding their weakness.People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- The widespread idea that people should make self-improvement a primary goal in their lives is problematic because it assumes that people are intrinsically deficient. 50
- Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in B 42
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 16
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ls more accurately. It will also define ones nature of handling pressure situations ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: People
... is like they are hiding their weakness.People who make decisions based on emotion and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64870592484 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401891252955 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1253164928 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.643373856901 0.243740707755 264% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22874855474 0.0831039109588 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.220365398465 0.0758088955206 291% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.458695653657 0.150359130593 305% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.261304394037 0.0667264976115 392% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.