One must be very thoughtful while making any decision whether the impact of it is big or small. Decision taken at any point of time decides the future course of life. A small decision has potential to change a person's life completely. It can set future to right path or can lead that person to opt for worst choices.
I confirm my support to author, any decision taken with emotion, with putting any thought logically , and then adding logics to it, does not make a person shrewd decision maker if not poor one. It is a human nature to justify one's action correct even though person itself has admitted fault.
Teenagers are more prone to make decision emotionally. A high school student succumbing to peer pressure, starts smoking cigarette and drinking alcohol. Same student might later regret this decision.
A canny decision maker is the one who compares deliberately weighs all the aspects. However if a person makes decision based on emotion can be not always marked as poor decision maker. Many successful people have followed passion which was result of their decision based on urge to follow something deeply.
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 33
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 80
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...mall decision has potential to change a persons life completely. It can set future to r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion, with putting any thought logically , and then adding logics to it, does not ...
^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...or one. It is a human nature to justify ones action correct even though person itsel...
^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udent might later regret this decision. A canny decision maker is the one who co...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...es deliberately weighs all the aspects. However if a person makes decision based on emo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 58.6224719101 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 2235.4752809 42% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 190.0 442.535393258 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93157894737 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.55969084622 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43371600699 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.4932671777 142% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 704.065955056 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5558932777 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0833333333 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416696515258 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141870663222 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120259328446 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232578950603 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108860412689 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.