We live in a world of competition, in order to keep survive in this world, every creature is trying hard to adapt to the changes of the world, otherwise we will be replaced or eliminated by the superior ones. A great society should encourage the living things whether animals or human beings to embrace innovations and adaptations. However, the reality is that every change is a suffering process. We are so obsessed with the comfortable environment we get used to, that we are less inclined to abandon current cozy life and make a different one, not guaranteeing the same good standard as before. Although it is recognized as uncomfortable, we realize those who succeed and stand till the last minute are the ones who are willing to make the first move, to accept the changes. No matter how difficult the situation is, we have more possibilities of winning and success by allowing for new thinking and acting.
It is rational for people to hold the idea of making changes in their thinking and acting, because it is risky. People tend to behave cautious and fastidious when making a decision in life. Fearing for failure and conflict, people are less willing to face the negative consequences the changes might lead to. And it is totally acceptable to double consider the proposal and conduct multiple experiments to ensure a pleasant result. Because once the project fails, the impact is significant and unbearable.
Furthermore, people think changes are unnecessary, as long as they sense their environment is safe and secure. Then why we bother a change? It is also understandable that during a certain period of time when everything goes on right order and nothing is challenging or harming the current harmony, we don’t need to make adjustment and change. The society is operating right on it track. One scenario is that a factory is running on a relatively old machine, but it still can afford the overall capacity of company’s order and can keep the company grow business, then there is no such need to think and act in a different way.
But when we take a look in a long term of development, we will realize the issue. Why people starts to think of an adjustment or innovation? Most likely due to current uncomfortable situation or challenge. If our environment is so comfortable then there is no reason to make a change. Nothing stays stasis in our world. The environment in which we felt comfortable yesterday may become miserable today, we are forced to adapt, to modify, to innovate regardless of how much pain and suffer we may endure in this process. The consequence of repudiating new thinking and acting is obsolete. The nature gives us the answer: animals unwilling to move their homes before storm comes will hardly survive in this disaster.
To summarize, it is tolerable for a society to stay in a comfortable zone for some time. We collect and restore our energy to get ready for the next challenge, since the comfortable zone is not going to sustain in a long term. A great society should be well-considered for the challenges in the future. Even though the road of changes may be difficult, the hope is: we still have another 50% of chances to success. We cannot allow the obstacles and constraints to stagnate our steps moving forward. Progress, in a long term is our aim for survive.
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities. 83
- The following appeared in a memorandum from a dean at Omega University."Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega profess 83
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the President of the Amburg Chamber of Commerce."Last October, the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined almost immediately. The 66
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 66
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...so understandable that during a certain period of time when everything goes on right order and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... there is no such need to think and act in a different way. But when we take a look in a long ter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t uncomfortable situation or challenge. If our environment is so comfortable then ...
^^
Line 4, column 588, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng new thinking and acting is obsolete. The nature gives us the answer: animals unw...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2755.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82486865149 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84041667932 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516637478109 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3942865506 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8333333333 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0333333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120201037888 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352161342116 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370877290151 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718716679852 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185521759483 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.