Science is meaningless without religion.
There is a dichotomy between scientific approaches and religious approaches rooted from ancient times. To some extent, religion feed the questions and principles of science hence science is not meaningful without religion for them, however, in my opinion, these are undoubtedly distinct notions so that creating such a symbiotic relationship is the meaningless act for few reasons which will be revealed below.
While science is known as questioning discipline, in contrast, religion is based on supersiticious belief and faith on some ancient conventions and stories. Science examines open questions and struggles to clarify their causes, evolutions and investigating possible solutions such as formation of bacterias, evolution of nebulas, analysis of solar system and more. For instance, first Galileo adverted that Earth is orbiting the Sun and it has a curvature shape, many religious people got frustrated and decided to punish him due to this aberrant claim instead of assessment and examination of such prospect. During these times, church had a rigid attitude, accordingly, any discovery seems an attempt to denigrate religion by pious people in ancient times. This illustrates, science and religion does not contribute mean to each other, in fact, there are mere cases which they intervene their spaces.
Furthermore, science has spent much time investigation of begining of humanity and created Big Bang Theory insted they have believed in a creator and its written fates about people. Science has a habit of finding logical connections about formation of a creature rather than accepting as sent or believing in that they were created mysteriously from nothing. For instance, Darwin has harshly been critisized due to his evolution theory in which he states that all present creatures has a former body and adaptations have changed to them into todays shape. This illustrates that scien
On the other hand, religion has fed some questions about healthy which leads to scientific researches on biology such as finding cure for cancer. Without religious ethic concerns, these studies will be much more less important.
In conclusion, all things considered, it is not sensible to declare that science is not meaningless without religion, in fact, science will be more enlightened and free from chains without religion.
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 83
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does. 87
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 83
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gful without religion for them, however, in my opinion, these are undoubtedly dis...
^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and struggles to clarify their causes, evolutions and investigating possible so...
^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many religious people got frustrated and decided to punish him due to this aberra...
^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...ic concerns, these studies will be much more less important. In conclusion, all things...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48199445983 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87064020649 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598337950139 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.946614452 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.230769231 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.21951772744 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363918551992 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121415465086 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152472818903 0.0758088955206 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236197648944 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176627323979 0.0667264976115 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.