Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
This topic raises a controversial issue of weather scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. Indisputably, every scientist or researcher should have right to choose whatever field of study they want to choose. Nevertheless, most of the researches chosen by the scientists and researchers are heavily funded by government with common people's tax money. Therefore, I believe that scientists should choose field of study which are likely to benefit greatest number of people.
First of all, when scientists and researchers focus on areas which are likely to benefit greater number of people, their possibility of success is more. I would like to point out that if finding solutions for a problem can benefit large number of people, there is a possibility that other scientist are working on that problem too, which increase the probability of solving the problem. To illustrate let us take an example of artificial intelligence. All top companies like Facebook, Tesla, Apple etc are working in this new field and trying to perfect this new technology. First, Apple started with Siri, Then came Echo by Amazon, and now Tesla is changing the future by inventing driverless cars. These driverless cars will not only save our time, but also help in reducing the road accidents. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that research areas that are likely to benefit greater number of people have more chance of success.
Furthermore, it is very common to hear that some or the other deadly disease is circulating a particular area and is spreading very fast. Specifically, few years back we heard of Swine flu and few months back we were hearing of Ebola virus. These deadly diseases can be cured when the great minds focus in these areas. Both common sense and personal experience has told us that these diseases should be eradicated as soon as possible for the betterment of mankind. Not only these comparatively new diseases, but one of the most known disease "AIDS" has not been able to be cured yet. Due to lack on knowledge about the STD's in rural areas, it is very common that these diseases emerge in rural areas and then spread to other areas. Greater number of scientists and researchers focus on this area greater will be the probability of finding the solution for this deadly disease. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that these great minds should focus on areas which can benefit greater number people.
Admittedly, there are other areas which cannot benefit greater number of people but are in interest of specific scientist and researchers. This is true specifically when these great minds are working to invent new hi-tech weapons for their country. In addition, these weapons can be used for the country's defense at the time of war. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that scientist and researchers should not focus on areas where greater number of people are benefitted.
In conclusion, although there are some areas where greater number of people are not benefited and can be focused, most of the areas should benefit greater number of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 83
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 70
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the st 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...I believe that scientists should choose field of study which are likely to benefit gr...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 525, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'benefit the greatest'.
Suggestion: benefit the greatest
...oose field of study which are likely to benefit greatest number of people. First of all, when...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd is spreading very fast. Specifically, few years back we heard of Swine flu and...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ard of Swine flu and few months back we were hearing of Ebola virus. These deadly diseases c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat scientist and researchers should not focus on areas where greater number of p...
^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould benefit greater number of people.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, as to, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08712121212 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68431017587 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448863636364 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.833236434 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.916666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32856124329 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110351029599 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113038179956 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220671576899 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968012947734 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.