Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
The author of the statement stated that those areas or fields that will be beneficial for the larger number of people should be focused on by the scientist. Many of us will argue that this will not hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
Science and technology bring lots of revolution from the industrial revolution to the Internet revolution and all credit goes to the scientist and researcher as through their continuous efforts and hard works all these become reality. If you ask someone or any individual about flying in the sky in the 18th and 19th century, they won't belive you and instead make fun of you. But now the whole planet Earth is connected with the airways. Technology brings a lot of easiness in human being lives and increase the productivity of any work you take, for example, before emails you have to post the mail or you can send a telegram if want to inform someone or ask about our near ones, but since the email was introduction we can end greeting or mails within few minutes depending on your internet speed.
Our scientist is continuously working to bring some changes in our lives or to invent something that will be beneficial to the world, sometimes they succeed but failed also in their research and even they spent whole life to their research but get nothing from it. But here the big question is that in which field or area they should be focused on. As recommended by the author that they should focus on those area they will able to benefit the greater number of people through their development. we can evaluate the effectiveness of the recommendation from the current situation of Covid-19. Now the scientist and researcher focused field is to produce a cure for this pandemic which cause destruction in the whole world, many have lost their lives because of this and the reason for this current situation is that we don't have a cure of it. So, from the current scenario, the recommendation is worthy and the scientist should be focused on the researcher in this area.
However, it is impossible to precisely predict the value of research. The research of Mendel was recognized decades later for its value to reveal the secret of inheritance. Turing machine was just a simple model, but the idea behind it opened an era of computer science. For many greatest discoveries, people at their time were often unable to truly understand the value of the research. Sometimes, it is even difficult to judge whether it is beneficial or not. For example, people initially studied opium for medical use to diminish pain. On the contrary, the issue of drug abuse creates much more pain, not to mention it even evoked wars in human history. Therefore, the great uncertainty of scientific research determines that the standard of benefits to most people is basically invalid.
In sum, we can say that the scientist and researcher should be encouraged to solve our troubles and make new inventions for our great future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | shubham1102 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 50
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the sky in the 18th and 19th century, they wont belive you and instead make fu...
^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ield or area they should be focused on. As recommended by the author that they sho...
^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...by the author that they should focus on those area they will able to benefit the greater n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...er of people through their development. we can evaluate the effectiveness of the r...
^^
Line 5, column 820, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n for this current situation is that we dont have a cure of it. So, from the current...
^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the researcher in this area. However, it is impossible to precisely predict th...
^^
Line 7, column 520, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ple initially studied opium for medical use to diminish pain. On the contrary, the ...
^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people is basically invalid. In sum, we can say that the scientist and resear...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2546.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58982722255 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496240601504 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2867260483 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330214988429 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942470323717 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092427311426 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162806509211 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928140996114 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.