Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

It is the responsibility of humans to maintain the ecological balance of our planet by their being the most intelligent creatures on earth. [Why? Ethically speaking, modernization creates suitable habitat for many animals and plants in urban environment so human acclivities are not always pushing endanger animals to the edge of extinction. ]Moreover, Man has the necessary power to save endangered species to ensure that the ecological balance of the Earth is not disturbed. [Actually, human power pales before the power of nature. How do we reach the conclusion that “ we have the NECESSARY power to save species?”]However, there is no apparent reason for society to protect endangered species at costs of money and jobs that are very high[At the expense of resources and jobs that are important for social development. ]. Therefore, it is essential that organization[What kind of organizations ?] makes all possible efforts to save endangered species, but if the costs involved are sky high, then the society can choose not to protect the species and save the human costs instead.

We no longer see Dinosaurs on the planet whereas they freely roamed on Earth eons ago. Has their non-existence made any difference to life on Earth? It can be accepted that their disappearance would have made some contrast [?]to the food chain as they were one of the most prominent predators.[Their extinction gives opportunities to small mammals, leaving niches for them to flourish in daytime, which is impossible when dinosaurs dominated the daytime economy . ] However, in today's context, their absence does not affect the food chain existing on the planet. Similarly, it is highly probable that the extinction of a particular species of animals may be of no consequence in the future. Therefore, it would not be justified to spend an enormous amount of money on trying to save the species.[good] On the other hand, if the species can be saved without much investment, then society should do its bit to preserve the environment and the animals that live therein.[And why should we do this ? need further development.]

The same line of reasoning may not hold for certain types of plants and animals. This is because apart from providing nutrition, certain species of plants and animals have been known to have therapeutic advantages including herbal remedies. For instance, cod-liver oil is well known for its content of Omega 3 fatty acids that help you fight against heart disease, cancer, depression, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, ulcers, diabetes and a host of other diseases. Plants containing Aloe Vera have now been found to have beneficial healing properties and all the species containing Aloe Vera are now in high demand. Therefore, society may have to attempt to save any of these species if they are endangered, but technology has now developed so much that one can look for other alternatives if the cost of saving these species goes beyond what society can easily afford.[For example?]

Certain natural events are beyond the control of society. Recurring floods, storms, forest fires, climatic changes, etc. may be playing havoc with the existence of certain types of rare species. There is little that society can do to contain such events in such a way that the species are preserved. There will be the requirement of pulling in maximum resources for making efforts to sav[To save something inherently means to make some efforts]e every endangered species. Society will need to go to extreme extents [Needs support here]in case of attempting to save endangered species that exist at high altitudes or ocean floors. Therefore, in a majority of cases, society should avoid trying to protect endangered species that would require huge efforts.[Otherwise......?]

The fact remains that in the face of catastrophic chain effects[This is not fully discussed in the previous paragraph.] as a result of the extinction of a particular plant or animal, it might become necessary for society to save the species. Other than this reason, there is no evident reason for which society should invest huge amounts of money and other human costs to save every species of plants and animals.[Unless some species are easily saved. ]

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
...nger animals to the edge of extinction. ]Moreover, Man has the necessary power to...
^^
Line 1, column 835, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
...t are important for social development. ]. Therefore, it is essential that organi...
^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... dinosaurs dominated the daytime economy . ] However, in todays context, their abs...
^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
...nosaurs dominated the daytime economy . ] However, in todays context, their absen...
^
Line 3, column 997, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Need
...ve therein.[And why should we do this ? need further development.] The same line ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 453, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
....[Unless some species are easily saved. ]
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3557.0 2235.4752809 159% => OK
No of words: 681.0 442.535393258 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22320117474 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10842213422 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02479920601 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 337.0 215.323595506 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494860499266 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1116.9 704.065955056 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.6255470241 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.208333333 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276795223311 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736850232296 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05938369291 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167035446754 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049173701462 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 100.480337079 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.