In the recent times of turbulent changes, corporations' help is eagerly solicited to save the environment and protect the well-being of society as a whole. Though the major motive of any corporation is to make as much money as possible, but in the current global scenario when environment is changing for the worse and the ill-deeds of human beings are being "paid-off" by our mother Earth in the form of "Global Warming" and the like, the corporations undoubtedly have a major role to play.
At this time, we can ask ourselves a question, why sould any industry put their important resources to protect the society and environment? For answering this question, we may have to do time travel. We go back to the times of industrial revolution in England and other parts of the world. Because of industrial revolution, coal mining industry had become very important. Coal was mined indiscriminately and also because of this, many migrant workers settled in the industrial towns in exorbitant count. The living conditions of these migrant workers were extremely squalid prone to many diseases and because of large scale coal mining, the environment of the city/town was that nobody could breathe in air without coal dust. The crux of this example is make understand that industries "have" changed the living conditions and environment and people can peremptorily "tell" to corporations that "you" cannot deny your part in destroying the environment and you should take part in saving measures. Still for paper industry or for clearing land for setting up an industry, forests are being wiped out and there are so many other examples. Its perfectly fine for the corporations to make as much money within law but
that day is not far when despite having amassed wealth, there would be no wood to be bought or cut as raw material for the paper industry. We can also take examples of the industries releasing waste materials into the river or release greenhouse gases into atmosphere. The effect of global warming is noticeable to everybody. The polar ice is dwindling faster than we think it is. The sea level is rising. The future of small island is in danger. And not only people, some nuclear reactors are also settled at the coast line in many countries. Because of the adverse effects of enviroment caused by improvident activities of corporations, one day, would engulf these corporations also.
In addition to moral redressal needed on the corporations part, the corporations like banks, software industries, which do not directly influence environment, should invest also in the greater cause for protect the society and environment. The big corporations like nationalised banks like Bank of America, giant IT companies like Google, Apple etc can spend some part of their profit say 2% for saving the environment. For example, Google has recently set a data center powered by renewable energy. These big companies have unusually high revenues and man power which they can use for this purpose. In contrast, smaller industries lack in these resources. So it is fine for them to pursue their monetery activities unless they are producing their adverse effect on environment. And if these big brands go on with their plans for "CSR" -
Corporate Social Responsibility - sometime in future set a legacy for emerging smaller companies to follow the same suit.
What would happen if all the corporations think that earning money is the only purpose they serve? It would have serious consequences. If car companies do not spend millions of dollars in researching solar powered cars and one day petroleum products are going to end. Then what would happen? Countries will be at war for reserving their rights on polar petroleum reserves currently unexplored. If afforestation is not done faster than deforestation, the entire Earth would be denuded. No amount of money can remedy these losses. People upon not finding resources to make both ends meet, there would be deadly clashes for jobs, water etc. This situation is a complete catastrophy.
Recapitulating, its indeed high time to ask corporations to do substantially for saving the society and environment. They can make all the money they want within the boundaries of law, but they should spend some part of thier profits for "correcting" the mistakes done in the past. This would be helpful for all the people in the world.
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 50
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reas 83
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 50
- Productivity and rewards 70
- "Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1029, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ou should take part in saving measures. Still for paper industry or for clearing land...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s dwindling faster than we think it is. The sea level is rising. The future of smal...
^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e think it is. The sea level is rising. The future of small island is in danger. An...
^^^
Line 4, column 681, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ne day, would engulf these corporations also. In addition to moral redressal need...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, well, for example, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3735.0 2235.4752809 167% => OK
No of words: 722.0 442.535393258 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17313019391 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.18363363724 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05622599085 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 364.0 215.323595506 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504155124654 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 1162.8 704.065955056 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9347415139 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.945945946 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5135135135 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16216216216 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.83258426966 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104602003405 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263341531163 0.0831039109588 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388028485351 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580286962441 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239254817344 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 100.480337079 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.