Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Many college students suffer from having to choose their field of study because this choice may affect their whole career. What type of career should the students decide may differ depending on what they value the most. I believe both of the opinions could be applicable based on their past experiences.
First of all, some people would asseverate that college students should follow their heart and pursue their talents and interests in choosing a field. However, this may be too idealistic compared to the harsh reality. Even if a student is extraordinarily exceptional in a certain field, if none of the people are interested and are willing to hire the student, his/her abilities would be of no use. If so, maybe it is more effective for the student to pursue both the field he/she would like to divulge in and the field that has a great potential of getting hired in the future. For example, many senior high school students in South Korea tend to pursue the study areas they always had desired of, because they had suffered long enough from the pressure of having to study only the monolithic curriculum. However, after attending the college with anticipation, they watch the examples of other forerunners in the field and realize the stark reality of having to experience difficulties in getting hired. Eventually, the students start searching for fields that has a large pool of employment and pursue such field of study as their second major. As in this reality, it may not be germane to advise students to only pursue their interests when choosing a major in college.
Similarly, it is also not apropos to advise students to only follow the study areas that would easily get them hired regardless of their interests or talents. Each fields requires different thinking abilities and each individuals usually consist only one that is the highest among the thinking abilities. For example, people who are erudite in science may be wanting in artistic abilities, while those who are bright in literature may be maladroit in gymnastics. Forcing such students to only follow paths that are guaranteed to have a large pool of employment would lead them to getting immense amount of stress and depression. They would suffer with having to follow up with those who are prodigious in such fields, always a reminder that they don't blend in the area. This would cause them to become desperate and devastated, undercutting the will to stay motivated and making them catapult into the abyss. If so, it would be more satisfying for students to pursue both the field that is apposite for them, and the field that guarantees employment.
Last but not least, the choices the students should make may differ based on their past experiences and it is most apropos for them to just pursue what seems most effective. For example, if a student is born in a family that is impecunious, it may be germane for students to first choose a major that has a high opportunity to earn money right after graduation. On the contrary, for students who does not have any predicaments that may force them to choose a major based on external pressure, it would be apposite for them to choose based on their interests. For both types of students, they do not always have to stick with their choices, they can always pursue either way whenever they have the chance.
To sum up, having students to only pursue in a certain way may not be germane based on their prior life. Moreover, there is always an option of choosing either fields as a second major. Due to such reasons, I believe the college students should compromise between the two fields and choose what may be suitable for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | mkm462 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | ZHOU0444 | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Sujan Adhikari | 50 | view |
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 3
- Among the intriguing mysteries that the dinosaurs have left for us one of the most persistent is what the arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex T rex were used for A recent presentation to the American Geological Society presented evidence to support the idea that th 73
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 63
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo Inc a chain of hobby shops Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon We discovered that there a 73
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ions could be applicable based on their past experiences. First of all, some people would assev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...gardless of their interests or talents. Each fields requires different thinking abil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'require'.
Suggestion: require
...their interests or talents. Each fields requires different thinking abilities and each i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., people who are erudite in science may be wanting in artistic abilities, while those who ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uch fields, always a reminder that they dont blend in the area. This would cause the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...s should make may differ based on their past experiences and it is most apropos for them to just...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, for example, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3034.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 628.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83121019108 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00598923014 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53111394263 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420382165605 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 938.7 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5670118106 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.36 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.12 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37419646843 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129499005744 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102470199731 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262049826535 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104157997291 0.0667264976115 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.