Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
An effective leader is one who adheres to his/her principles, and objectives even in the times when they disagree with the public. However, in the realms of our discussion, we cannot overlook scenarios where yielding to the public is beneficial.
First, every person has his/her own principles and mores: It is these ethics that define and identify a leader.
If a person doesn't adhere to what he/she believes in - then the identity of the person is jeopardized. The people
should look upto a leader who, however, can guide them in the right direction for the prosperity of the society. If the objectives
of the public and the leader are the same, then there will be no friction between the leader and the public. What if the motives of the - public and the leader are not aligned in the same direction? What if the public is wrong and the leader should succumb to the will of the public? Only an effective leader who strongly adheres: to what he/she believes can convince the public that what they believe is wrong and can steer them in the right direction.
Second, do you give your 100% to achieve something that you don't believe in? The answer is definitely no. on the contrary, Only when a person strongly believes - in what he/she does will they surpass unsurmountable heights. In politics, a person will have to sacrifice everything - time, money, and even family. Therefore, A person will oblige to sacrifice everything only when he/she truly believes in the cause they fight for. However, If the leader does not believe in what he/she is fighting for and is only doing so to please the mob, it is very highly - unlikely that the leader will achieve anything substantial. Thus, The public will look: upto the leader as a saviour. Both the public and the leader will have to settle for a subliminal, outcome when the leader does not believe, in what he/she fights for.
Having said that, there can be scenarios where the objectives: of the public and the leader may not be aligned in the same direction. For example, one of the local body representatives in my village planned to place a total lockdown to contain the spread of an epidemic in the village. But the public was not willing to oblige - to the mandate as most of them live on daily wages and the lockdown was affecting their livelihood. The President had no other choice but to relax the lockdown rules so that the poor could mitigate their hardships.
To sum up, I personally believe that for someone to be an effective leader, he/she should strongly adhere to what they believe in as it - is these ethics that define a person and will prod them to achieve something that, is truly remarkable for, the people to whom they intend to serve.
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 62
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always temng the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to suoport your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use rnemorized examples 73
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 50
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hics that define and identify a leader. If a person doesnt adhere to what he/she b...
^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ine and identify a leader. If a person doesnt adhere to what he/she believes in - the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should look upto a leader who, however, can guide them in the right direction fo...
^^
Line 6, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the public. What if the motives of the - public and the leader are not aligned in...
^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...your 100% to achieve something that you dont believe in? The answer is definitely no...
^^^^
Line 9, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o to please the mob, it is very highly - unlikely that the leader will achieve an...
^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y adhere to what they believe in as it - is these ethics that define a person and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73263157895 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49924146134 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418947368421 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.208326332 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.181818182 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282411904545 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938174570149 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600394135585 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137220524061 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062170827193 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.