Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.

I agree with the statement that technology provides better ways to communicate and connect to people and does not reduce our opportunities for human interaction. The usage of technology is ever increasing and also some new technology or improvements to existing ones comes in every day. Nowadays, irrespective of ages, people use technology to connect and communicate to other people. It is very rare to see a house in which people dont use mobiles or tablets or computers these days. Such increasing use of technology not only helps people to connect to their friends and relatives, but also to get to know many people with common interests or get new friends or connect to people who can give you job opportunities.

There are a lot of examples to list regarding how technology provides people with better ways to communicate with others. Here are most popular examples - there are a lot of social networking sites that allow people to communicate with other people around the world, find new friends who have common interests, participate in open discussions about various interesting topics, express their feelings about what they like the most and what they don't like and so on. There are also other advantages of modern technology. People can connect with other people who work in good companies and get to know them. This can help them in getting a better job opportunity and a good career. There are so many other ways of better and effective interaction with people around the globe as use of technology increases.

I would say that technology only increases our opportunities to interact with other people. Using technology, people get to become friends with friends of their friends. They then hangout with them and the human interaction increases. One might argue that not every one hangs out like that and that people only connect to other people through their mobiles or computers. I agree that there are few people who connect to other people only through these devices, but still it is much better than having a very small group of friends as people get to know about different things when they connect to so many people using the latest technology. Besides, even before there was an increase in the use of technology, people used to interact with other people at home, workplace or their schools and even now people have these human interaction every day.

In sum, technology not only helps people to communicate and connect with other people across the globe in better ways, but also increases the opportunities for human interaction. There would be only increase in human interaction with increase in use of technology if people know how to use it.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
... or improvements to existing ones comes in every day. Nowadays, irrespective of ages, people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ery rare to see a house in which people dont use mobiles or tablets or computers the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t what they like the most and what they dont like and so on. There are also other ad...
^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: There are other; There are also
...most and what they dont like and so on. There are also other advantages of modern technology. People...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, regarding, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95991091314 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66344713056 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391982182628 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.14128909 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.210526316 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522139264201 0.243740707755 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214495867161 0.0831039109588 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124075883608 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403175980634 0.150359130593 268% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841403287909 0.0667264976115 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.