Teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would lead a child to think in a way that is more logical about everything he is surrounded. Of course this might lead him to be great moral person in his life but sometimes teaching only this is not enough.
Let's assume a simple case, you are walking through a street and see a child who is washing some plates on a shop and shopkeeper being as an astringent person, screaming on him for not doing things properly. Morally you should record this case and file it to the police since this type of work comes under child labor but somehow you go and have some conversation to the child. Here child describes his situation as he is the only eldest person in house and he needed to take care of his younger sister so it is necessary to work for surviving. In this type of case if you would have gone morally to report it to the police, the shopkeeper would have got arrested and child might had lost his job if government is not great enough to take care of these type of children. Logically you should have taken a different step of admitting both sibling into school and taking care of them. Somehow the second option is the tough one so most of people not using any of them ignores the situation. Now it completely depends upon you about the path you take but the story clarifies one thing for sure that the both thing might get clash for many issues in society and could lead to the ignoring things.
In some cases it is right to think logical but in some cases it might had bad consequences as well. Instead of teaching morality or logical reasoning, they should be taught using morality in logical way.
In sense in previous example he should have contacted police and as well as NGO so that both of the things could be taken care of.
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 66
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had gone'?
Suggestion: had gone
... surviving. In this type of case if you would have gone morally to report it to the police, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 935, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...w the second option is the tough one so most of people not using any of them ignores the situa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'of course', 'as well as', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.188034188034 0.240241500013 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.193732193732 0.157235817809 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0740740740741 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0626780626781 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0769230769231 0.0444667217837 173% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.131054131054 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0683760683761 0.0406280797675 168% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.3076943906 2.79330140395 83% => OK
Infinitives: 0.031339031339 0.030933414821 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102564102564 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037037037037 0.0249443105267 148% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00569800569801 0.0148568991511 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1795.0 2732.02544248 66% => OK
No of words: 331.0 452.878318584 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42296072508 6.0361032391 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.262839879154 0.366273622748 72% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.175226586103 0.280924506359 62% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.105740181269 0.200843997647 53% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0815709969789 0.132149295362 62% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3076943906 2.79330140395 83% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 219.290929204 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501510574018 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 51.6267419497 55.4138127331 93% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 27.5833333333 23.380412469 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8174876302 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.583333333 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 23.380412469 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 45.1059919436 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.16239316239 1.64882698954 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288258341144 0.391690518653 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145749238912 0.123202303941 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0438092262218 0.077325440228 57% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.606531815861 0.547984918172 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175376183544 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133796485339 0.161403998019 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649477616445 0.0892212321368 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.211596925252 0.385218514788 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0522067431833 0.0692045440612 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203575945548 0.275328986314 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397274711281 0.0653680567796 61% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.