Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about whether students should have to question which they learn or not. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find that some people hold the opinion that questioning which students learn is a very good way to let them learn much well, which others have an opposite attitude that in the basic level of education, students should not question which they are taught. As far as I concerned, I disagree with the statement of the topic. The following discussion will explore my view.
First of all, the development of civilization is from questioning things which be learned by human or around them. According to the research conducted by the Executive Yuan in my country, students who would ask more questions than others from in school will perform much great in the test, because asking questions which especially come from students learning processes will help them keep much more information in brain and think the essence of knowledge than whose are few to ask questions. This phenomenon is not rare that many countries have the same researches, only have little difference.
On the other hand, the origin of any thinking is always from presenting meaningful questions. However, the students in the state of basic development of the education are hard to propose the questions which are meaningful and help them to process some advancing thinking. They do not understand which questions they should ask, which information they should rethink, and which situation they could ask their questions. In such a phase, students should follow teachers because if the knowledge is the ocean, and students are boats, teachers just like the directors who lead students to sail on the right paths. In contrast, letting students ask questions in the wrong stages which just like giving them sharp knives when they are still young. Such would possible to harm their development.
In fact, asking and following both have its own advantages and disadvantages, and one of them is the best. We should take different approaches depending on the different stages. The development of human's society, of course, is in a series of accepting, criticizing and developing repeatedly. Therefore, in the good environment and the well-developed thinking, we would encourage students to ask more questions.
In conclusion, despite the fact that asking questions is helpful to learning, there are still many factors we should consider discreetly, Therefore, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | atharva1996 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Kiran1901 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | ifxcuo | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people. 58
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic an 80
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively. 50
- The following is a letter to the head of the Tourism Bureau on the island of Tria Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry In order to stop the erosion we should charge people for usi 80
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to pretect the environment is better, but some people say the traditional energy source such as coal and oil is less expensice, what is your suggestion. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, of course, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23960880196 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82044574249 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508557457213 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.7740936414 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.055555556 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244129019683 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734713089947 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723603260039 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134611760345 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837319634678 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.