The speaker claims that setting goals and achieving success goes hand in hand. Success can't be measured as such but considering the goals a person had in mind can help us in evaluating one's success.
Firstly, when a person is more planned in his endeavor, the probability of completing the task is higher. Every person, including the CEO of Google to a layperson tries setting his visions and goals before setting out for a mission. For example, every company has a group of employees called project managers whose job is to set a timeline mentioning the deadlines for every task. These deadlines are tantamount to setting goals when we want to accomplish a task. The companies with such planned timeline of tasks have records of performing very well and achieving success.
Admittedly, it might seem that setting out goals might limit our imagination and confine us to stick to our goals and not digress from it but this isn't true. However, this approach turns to be more efficient and helps us to stick to our plan and avoids deviating from our mission. For instance, a student wants to finish his project within 10 days. Which would be a viable option? An approach with no deadlines set or a planned out schedule? Definitely, the former approach could lead to a lot of confusion like not knowing how to proceed if there are discrepancies in the project. While the latter approach might not be foolproof, it can help a student be more prepared and doesn't lead to a lot of last minute pending work.
Finally, when a person sets a goal and achieves his/her goal, it makes him/her more motivated to proceed further. It gives more confidence knowing everything has been scheduled and leads to an organised execution of things. It is true that one can achieve success without planning, for example, Einstein didn't have any goals set to conclude the fact about gravity. Despite this fact, an organised approach is always a better approach in comparison to the success with no goals set aside.
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 50
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ving success goes hand in hand. Success cant be measured as such but considering the...
^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n had in mind can help us in evaluating ones success. Firstly, when a person is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... goals and not digress from it but this isnt true. However, this approach turns to b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...can help a student be more prepared and doesnt lead to a lot of last minute pending wo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...without planning, for example, Einstein didnt have any goals set to conclude the fact...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8250728863 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58775221155 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8244488826 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.9444444444 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191974164423 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657596623539 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466275291555 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127596626141 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215936748558 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.