The major cities of a nation usually are usually filled with the nation’s most advanced developments. They are also concentrated in economic headquarters, political forces, and cultural groups. I agree with the statement that major cities should be in the priority for one to study a nation’s traits. However it is also worthy to take a look in other areas of the nation, such as in rural and suburban areas, to determine the true value of a nation.
Big cities also have a lot to offer culturally to the societies they serve. The cities usually have a dense population of people coming from all around the world and the cultures that they bring into the cities. In a culturally rich society, cultures are likely to collide with one another with transformative effects. Thus, more fusions of cultures are likely to form in big cities, and to understand the most advanced characteristics of a nation, one should not skip its major cities. However, because of this culturally rich environment, the dominant culture of a society is likely to overshadow less-popular cultures that nonetheless play an important role. Thus, big cities might not be the best subjects to study suburban cultures of a country. Scholars should also examine other areas of the country.
In addition to culture, politics also has a significant impact on society’s overall structure. Major cities are often the center of media headquarters and where younger generations reside. It is very likely that politicians decide to use a big city to start off their campaigns or set up a debate in the city. A nation’s politics is also closely connected to its culture and economic status, an intertwining which is enhanced further in cities. Therefore, along with the economic advantages and culturally rich environment, big cities also offer abundant political resources for one to understand a nation.
However, researchers should not ignore areas besides the major cities in determining the characteristics of society. To get an overall picture of a country’s political status, it is also equally important to study its non-urban areas, far away from the major centres of commerce. For example, farmers and blue-collar workers are still considered an important source of economic contribution to a nation’s GDP. Politicians probably don’t want to lose their vote in elections, and will make appeals to a diverse array of the electorate. In summary, to get a comprehensive picture of a nation’s traits, one not only needs to assess the values of big cities through political, cultural, and economic facets but also needs to examine the same factors in non-urban areas.
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 54
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 80
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.(2) 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
The major cities of a nation usually are usually filled with the nation's m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...or one to study a nation's traits. However it is also worthy to take a look in oth...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22969837587 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0813549988 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475638051044 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4770808102 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134264044949 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475755416806 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525988292594 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901640781601 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123291750418 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.