I can only agree with part of this statement. There are some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, people always get some impression from major cities in another Country. These cities include New York City in the United States, Toronto in Canada, Sydney in Australia, Beijing, and Shanghai in China, etc. These cities have some common characteristics, such as a developed economy, open to all the countries, have beautiful scenery and famous tour cities, etc. Some important features are infant rate and death rate, average lifetime, etc, they are unwise. From these city lists, you can found that New York City has people from all over the country, there are too many different customs and it can only represent part of America. In fact, there are so many different style states in the USA. New York, Toronto, Sydney, Shanghai, etc, these cities almost mean freedom. If you want to look for the most important characteristics of a society, you should research smaller cities.
Secondly, if you try to understand the health level of these major cities, it might not accurate. Because air pollution is very serious in some big cities. The air pollution in New York City is more serious than other cities, but it cleaner than Beijing or another major city. Some people have not very well health in the serious pollution area.
Finally, as everyone knows, Shanghai is a developed city and China is a developing country. If you only study Shanghai, you will not understand some under low-income cities. In fact, the major cities are a special case.
To sum up, we should study these major cities and these cities are representative, but if people want to understand the most important characteristics of a society, only study these cities is not enough.
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 50
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 56
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving th 50
- Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rom all over the country, there are too many different customs and it can only represent part ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... part of America. In fact, there are so many different style states in the USA. New York, Toro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...se major cities, it might not accurate. Because air pollution is very serious in some b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, in fact, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95286195286 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59264069219 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7106083686 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7222222222 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182530906689 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694131108316 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927455203125 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11951289313 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223648900569 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.