To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Society as it presents is a complex integration of different ethics and religious propensity which depicts their norms and values. The prompt recommends that only the major cities can cite the important characters of the society be it the historical background or their institutional functioning. In my opinion, I moderately agree with the prompt as every civilization and culture has its own method of molding and evolving with time.
To begin, in the past most of the kingship and monarch reside in the cities, thereby following with the cultural diversity and representing its values. For example, The Kathmandu valley has always been the centre of attraction since the time immemorial. The valley which represents the cultural diversity at its best is also popularly known as ‘City of temples’, fortifying the cultural evolution of native residents also called as ‘newars’. Studying this city can certainly edify one with the cultural and religious dimension of this city, starting from its people to the monuments and artistic beauty carved in every nooks and corners. The native residents are peculiar to this city saving and representing their culture and the culture of this city as a whole.
However, studying the valley alone is not enough to understand the persisting diversity as whole. Nepal is more diverse than just studying one ethnic group. The cultural propensity is on the verse of modification because of modernization and urbanization in major cities of the country. So it is necessary to search in the rural areas where social practices and cultural beliefs are still on act and well protected. The modernizing societies of the cities tend to devalue the cultural heritage causing it to deteriorate and eventually fade away, however, the rural hold its value as pristine and it was previously hold. Perhaps, the cities have cultural representation but their commercial and modernized philosophies and practices have adulterated its essence and norms.
Further, rural areas represent the real face and function of the culture. For example, the mystic view of Ghalegaun. A small village in Nepal is primal in saving the cultural diversity of Nepal as a whole. Representing the local ethnic society and promoting the cultural conservation, it is one of the major village where societal characteristic of then and now Nepal can be analyzed and understood. Similarly, the rural areas of Baitadi and Bajura are other major places where culture and society of real Nepal can be seen, their dimensions can be analyzed and persisting unity in diversity can be understood.
Cities can be a representation of the society but the cultural ethos and values can only be preserved in the rural areas as most of the urban areas are prone to modernization and urbanization. Rural areas represent the real face of the society, its cultural heritage and development through time.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 33 | view |
2023-10-11 | Mallika Asthana | 50 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 66
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 83
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 65
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their wor 53
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'held'.
Suggestion: held
...value as pristine and it was previously hold. Perhaps, the cities have cultural repr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23010752688 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94127672937 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449462365591 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.744835182 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.80952381 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240592970224 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714453259209 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053110472329 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135070784091 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037588412909 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.