To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The given statement is related to the characteristics of the society. Our society is formed with different communities, cultures, religions, and different beliefs. In addition, society consists of cities, suburban, and remote. To understand the important characteristics of a society, it is important to study cities because cities can have different aspects of the society. But just studying the cities we can not understand cities as a whole. I have a different view than presented in the statement. The following paragraphs will explain why it is not enough just by studying the major city to understand the society.
Last year, the Ministry of Tourism and Culture, the government of Nepal studied the major cities. However, later one non-government organization scrutinized the report published by Ministry, they found that there is incomplete information about the society. In that report most important aspects of the society were missing; different characteristics of the people, their languages, religions, and traditional cultures were missing. It is also important to study the city to understand the societies, although, it is not enough to understand which is clearly shown by the report of the Ministry.
Another piece of evidence is that an international non-government organization came here to Nepal and they tried to understand the characteristics of Nepali societies; for that, they started to study major cities of Nepal after six months of study they did not understand all the characteristics of the society then they started a study of different parts of Nepal and understood the more comprehensive characteristics of the society. So this evidence also shows that to understand the characteristics of any society it is important to study places other than cities. Obviously, it is important to study the cities for more understanding but it is not enough so one should study not only cities but also other parts of society.
Some people argue that one must study the society to understand the characteristics of the society. Although the argument can be denied completely, shreds of evidence and examples show that one should study diverse areas of society to understand society because there is a difference between the cities and remote or suburban from culture, economic status, and religion which is the real scenario of Nepal.
Summarising the above-mentioned pieces of evidence and examples related to the importance of studying different parts and aspects of the society, one must study different parts of the study to understand the characteristics of the society.
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 54
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 62
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38970588235 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2164100916 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394607843137 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.0368713732 60.3974514979 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.352941176 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64705882353 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258981541906 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10553040862 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514638418029 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168726312814 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242219357052 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.