Universities design their curriculum in such a way that it would prepare the student in the long run after graduation. They can find a relevant job in their respective field. For this, the universities decide specific eligibility criteria for a particular course so that only deserving candidates can enroll in such courses which would be conducive to complete the course successfully after which they would develop the relevant skills to work in that area. I disagree with the claim that universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
The students would indeed grow in that field in which they are interested to study. But we should also keep this in mind that while we are student, we are unsure about our taste and temperaments. Students change their temperaments very frequently. Sometimes, under peer pressure, they opt for very abstruse courses for which they do not fulfill the prerequisites. As the result, in the end, they have to drop from the courses due to poor grades. Therefore, only considering prerequisites they should be assigned the courses rather than solely based on their interest in the study.
Indeed, universities should not be too much obstinate about the fixed structure of the curriculum. If the student is not having a keen interest in studying a particular topic, he/she must be given the flexibility of choosing the desired course if the student satisfies the desired eligibility. If someone is not having an interest in a particular course, he/she will not able to do good in that area. It will impede their holistic academic performance. They will get bad grades and will not be able to develop the required skill set. To illustrate, Albert Einstein did not like history, as it was a mandatory course, he had to drop himself off from school. Then he pursued science as his passion and in the end, he made an impact in society. He is now remembered as the godfather of physics. The student will be happy to do what they like to do. Thus, they should be allowed to take courses which they like to study. The curriculum should be flexible.
As the course prerequisite is essential to cope up with the course in the long run. I reject the statement that universities should allow students to take courses which they like to study or having a keen interest to study.
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 78
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated 50
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
.... The curriculum should be flexible. As the course prerequisite is essential to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89800995025 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74064447716 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480099502488 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.547922109 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6086956522 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4782608696 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04347826087 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291815926646 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914478785647 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937119596369 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210868693891 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568167842144 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.