First I noticed Mr. Avinash Patil was during my lectures, as a professor at the university, of Database Programming because he had eccentric interest in the practical applications of the subject. He pursued the classes with utmost sincerity and was keen to get a good grasp of the concepts. His involvement made the lectures interactive and fruitful. Because of his determination to studies, he was able to frequently secure good grades in many courses as evidenced by his transcripts. His GPA puts him in the distinctive students of that batch. This brings me to the evaluation process we had.
During the course we had three unit tests, to evaluate students’ knowledge on ongoing chapters, of which best scores from two tests would be used in final evaluations. On completion of each semester students had to face subjective examinations and comprehensive oral interviews (Viva Voce). And I used to frequently participate as a member of evaluation panel to examining students’ ability to practically apply the taught concepts. Avinash had been able to consistently secure top grades in Comprehensive Viva and distinctive grades in unit tests and subjective examinations.
On the other hand, his achievements in extracurricular activities are worth mentioning. He used to discuss with me about various workshops he had attended and latest trends and technologies that were being used in the software industry, which he continues till date. He has also won two medals in badminton tournaments held on the university campus. For the fulfillment of degree every student is required to submit a project and his was an android application that found and marked public restrooms near the user’s location which I believe has been published, by one of his mentors from his internship, on the play store.
In addition to extracurricular, he strives to keep himself abreast of the recent research and advances in the field by reading various journals and attending various academic courses online. His ability to communicate and explain intricate concepts effortlessly is impressive and makes him a good candidate for graduate studies.
Conclusively, with our discussions regarding his career plans, he wants to pursue MS in CS and as he mentioned, your program seems to be among his first preferences. And I would like to give my high recommendations to Mr. Avinash Patil for admission into your program.
- Write a letter to a friend to ask for his/her help to collect money for a charity organization. The letter needs to cover the following details.- why do you want to collect money for the charity organization?- Ask your friend to help- explain in detail ho 73
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 58
- People remember special gifts or presents that they receive Why Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- It is said that, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books.'Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books.In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?Give reasons for your answer and include an 61
- Many people believe that criminals should be imprisoned; others, however, say they should do unpaid work that is beneficial for the community. Do you agree and disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2961038961 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22412268855 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574025974026 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8760836283 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.277777778 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601125859517 0.243740707755 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0189083423467 0.0831039109588 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444954835082 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0414275875481 0.150359130593 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487333904493 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.