The value of integrating different disciplines in a curriculum is overestimated in the present times, the stated claim is not true to greater extent. Everyone has a right to know what he/she likes and for that it is necessary to know fundamentals of all the disciplines. The stated reason supports the given claim, but to know the fundamentals in all the disciplines one should focus on more than one area.
Everyone has a right to pursue what he/she wants. To have a better understanding of the basics of all the areas one must not focus on a single area of study. It is necessary to understand the interest area of an individual to reach a conclusion of his/her own likes and dislikes. For having a clear idea of these likes and dislikes integrating different disciplines is necessary.
Besides fundamentals of many areas are necessary in daily life as well. Nowadays medical field, engineering field, food industry etc are advancing very fast. So, to choose the career one must know what are the basics of those disciplines and should be able to chalk out his/her own likes and dislikes. To understand those likes and dislikes it is much more necessary to understand what lies in the particular field.
Steve Jobs had stated the importance of connecting the dots, that is if anyone has fundamental knowledge in more than one stream it can be applied to create something new which might help in boosting the career to a huge extent. Steve Jobs while pursuing his education, he was also learning calligraphy. He inculcated his calligraphy which is now used as different types of fonts. So, having knowledge of multiple disciplines might help to greater extent.
Hence to understand one's own likes and dislikes, one should have fundamental knowledge. Also, it might help in a problem or may create something more creative and interesting. The given claim and the reason provided for it is not correct to greater extent.
- Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy even though they cause damage to the environment 58
- Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy even though they cause damage to the environment 50
- The following appeared in a note from a sedan owner to a friend Of the two top brands of cars introduced in past year Kia cars are clearly more superior to the competing Alfa cars Kia cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 50 kms p 50
- The main objective of education is to procure a job 50
- Because of television and worldwide computer connections people can now become familiar with a great many places that they have never visited As a result tourism will soon become obsolete
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...plines might help to greater extent. Hence to understand ones own likes and dislik...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9263803681 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84631503487 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463190184049 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9433240455 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152766552634 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545778482572 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870601715404 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898651480698 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703829947664 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...plines might help to greater extent. Hence to understand ones own likes and dislik...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9263803681 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84631503487 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463190184049 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9433240455 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152766552634 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545778482572 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870601715404 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898651480698 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703829947664 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.