Technological advancement in digital and print media opened doors to new set of problems. Celebrity status comes with a price, agreed by all, but unnecessary intervention into their life-style by reporters might disturb their work-life balance. It is true, news about famous people gets public attention, but that is no excuse for anybody to breach their privacy. In this context, I am totally against the view' invading private life of well known personality is a part of success package'. In this essay I will try to deduce various scenarios depicting both points with relevant examples.
First of all, growing paparazzi culture tarnishing image of a celebrity and peace of mind. In recent days, television reporters who tried to take pictures of an actress at an airport received severe backlash from society. Furthermore, as long as unfair media trial continues, sense of freedom will be lost. On the other hand, sense of suspicion that they are always watched by someone, keeps them psychologically challenged. For example, in an interview -Olympic athlete Rajesh described that frequent vigilance of media caused him stress and ultimately resulted in underperformance. We listen many such stories in cases of actors and other talented artists. Secondly, it is waste of time to common audience to know everything about their favourite hero or heroine.
On other side of spectrum, we have people who argue that the attention given to public figures is for their own good as it keeps them steady in their professional life. Moreover, according to them, it's dream come true for many people to be in limelight and occupy space in front page of a reputed newspaper. However, sociologists suggest that deep research is necessary before generalizing these concepts. Nevertheless, we don't have any right jeopardizing the private life of an important person as it may even cause fatalities. Classic example is ,the erratic behavior of a reporter caused death of Princess Diana. Before it's too late, we all should condemn such heinous acts.
Therefore, we can safely conclude the topic by saying that responsible journalism has no place for unrelated cover story of a celebrity. Instead, they can concentrate on sensation topics which will be helpful for both citizens and journalists career. Ofcourse, government can control freedom of speech but till then we too have power to discourage satellite channels whenever they telecast rubbish content.
- A healthy person is often described as someone who has a good diet gets lots of exercise and avoid stress What should people do to stay healthy in your country Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exp 84
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no special knowledge of thefollowing topic Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common disea 89
- You recently took a part-time job working for a local company. After a few weeks, you realized there were some problems with the job.Explain why you took the jobDescribe the problem you experiencedsuggest what could be done about them. 84
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country. You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture.write a letter to the landlord. In your letter-introduce yourself-explain what is wrong with the furni 73
- You have been invited to attend on interview for a place studying a course in a college Unfortunately because of a previous appointment you you cannot come at the time they wish Write a letter to the admissions tutor and explain your position Apologise 87