The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates amount of native students and international students studying in track of computer science, divided into two categories: men and women, at UK universities between 2010 to 2012.
According to men, the number of British students was fluctuated. It started from approximate 40 persons in 2010 before dropped to 25 persons in 2011, and rose up thereafter to more than 40 persons. At the same period, the number of students from outside UK increased considerably: 20 persons, 25 persons, and 40 persons, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively.
Regarding women, the amount of British students in 2010 was about 30 persons. This number went up thereafter to 45 persons in next year (2011), and there was no significant change in 2012. For aboard students, the numbers of them increased gradually with year: 15 persons in 2010, and 20 persons in2012.
All in all, we can see that before 2010, the numbers of native students were more than two times of international students, in both men and women. However, since 2011, the numbers of men students from UK and outside were almost equal.
- DO COMPUTERS THINK 87
- Pets should be treated like family members 80
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below.You should write at least 150 wo 63
- In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree?Write at least 250 words. 75
- The Sydney Opera House Referring to the main points in the reading passage describe the Opera Sydney House Then using information from both the reading and the lecture then explains why the professor classifies the building as unique 68
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 185 200
No. of Characters: 883 1000
No. of Different Words: 90 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.688 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.773 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.668 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 51 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.618 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.222 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.502 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.729 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.242 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4