The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two diagrams show students responses to the question of how good they are to managing the finances. The pie chart refers to the ability of UK students to manage their finance and the table reference to the percentage of ability by their age.
Less than a quarter students had bad organized managing finances, the chart shows there are 24 percent either “not at all” or “not very”. However, as can be seen there are more seven in ten (71%) belive they are either “fairly” or “very” organized financially.
The table shows that age of students determined their capability to m...
- (CHEVENING SCHOLARSHIP) Your leadership and networking skills:Outline your experience and style of leadership. You should discuss your commitment to networking within the Chevening community, and beyond, in order to find solutions or bring about beneficia 63
- The table and the bar chart below give information about traveling to work in Houston, Texas.Summarise the inform by selecting and reporting the main futures, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 90
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 60
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 80
The conclusion is older students have better capability to manage the finance,
The conclusion is that older students have better capability to manage the finance,
Error: belive Suggestion: believe
Error: eight-teen Suggestion: eighteen
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 800 1000
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.678 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.444 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.438 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.496 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.829 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4