Essay topics:
the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart describes the popularity of four different types of food consumed in European countries between 1979 and 2004. Overall, the trend of food consumption wasn't uniform. The chicken consumers increased dramatically, while beef, lamb and fish fell steadily.
Firstly, in 1979 the lowest consumption was chicken and fish . The chicken started approximately 150 grams per person per week. However, after 1984 the consumption of the chicken rose gradually and then increased significantly and finally ended at 250 grams per person per week in 2004. Whereas, the fish ...
Votes
Essay Categories
Essays by user gollu
:
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this? (IELTS BO 85
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 70
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among Students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.( IELTS BOOK 5 TEST 2) 70
- ( re write) Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- ( re-write)The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. ( ielts book 5 test 4) 70
Sentence: However, in the year 1979 and 2004 the trend of the chicken, beef and lamb were fluctuating wildly.
Description: The fragment fluctuating wildly . is not usually preceded by were
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace were with was
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 9
No. of Words: 214 200
No. of Characters: 1061 900
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.825 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.958 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.634 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.56 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.469 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.686 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.213 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4