The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph illustrates the consumption of different types of meat in a European country for each person per week between 1979 and 2004.
The consumption of all kinds of meat had a downward trend except for chicken. Also in 1979, the usage of Chicken was about 150 grams which was equal to the consumption of Lamb approximately. In addition, Beef and Fish were eaten 220 and 55 grams per week per person respectively.
Nevertheless, in this period of time the consumption of Beef and Lamb declined considerably and reached to 101 and 52 grams respectively by taking account of some fluctuations for the usage of Beef between 1980 and 1986. Besides, the eating of Fish decreased marginally and reached to just under 50 grams. It is worth considering that the trend of the usage of Fish was the most stable one in comparison with others. Moreover, by 2004 the consumption of chicken had soared to 250 grams.
In conclusion, since 1979 although the eating of Beef, Lamb, and Fish has fallen, the usage of chicken has experienced a substantial rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 06/30/2021 - 08:24 | nguyenvuonglinhchi | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 70
- Nowadays in some countries the numbers of children aged 15 and younger are increasing. What are the current and future effects of ever increasing population? 47
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it is important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 80
- Recently there has been a rapid rise in the divorce rate among the young Discuss the key factors that might increase the rate of divorce in modern society 82
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 10
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 843 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.683 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.766 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.149 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.669 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4