The bar chart compares the information about proportion of people living civic regions in various part of the world in the years 1950, 2007 and 2050.
Overall, the population in all parts of the world grown until 2007 and this is expected to continue by 2050.
It is easy to see that Africa and Asia, whose citizens rate tripled in 2007, had low per cent of world population with 15% and 17%, respectively. However, North America and Oceania, which had the same proportion of residents with just over a six tenth, generated the vast majority of populations. Between 1950 and 2007, Latin America and Caribbean inhabitants doubled from 42% to 76%. On the one hand, five out of ten people lived in Europe in the middle of the last century.
It is predict that the proportion of citizens will increase slightly with ranging between 76% and 90% without Africa and Asia in the rest of the urban areas. By contrast, the per cent of inhabitants of Africa and Asia will rise evenly with almost 65%.
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents. 78
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 79
- The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation sys 89
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both view and give your own opinion 61
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'predicted'.
Suggestion: predicted
... the middle of the last century. It is predict that the proportion of citizens will in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67428571429 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42877982299 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6179030504 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14121738201 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588925922181 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760624577075 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101107965347 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853551228151 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.